Numerical strategies for damage assessment of reinforced concrete block walls subjected to blast risk: Fid-Bau Portal

Numerical strategies for damage assessment of reinforced concrete block walls subjected to blast risk

Campidelli, M. / Tait, M.J. / El-Dakhakhni, W.W. / Mekky, W.

Graphical abstract Display Omitted

Highlights • Third-scale reinforced concrete block walls under blast pressure are investigated. • Novel strain rate dependent macro-model is developed for dynamic/fragility analysis. • Model output sensitivity to tensile strength and pressure history is discussed. • Flexural strength increase associated with strain rate effects is quantified. • Predictions are corroborated using live explosive test results.

Abstract Computational tools and numerical strategies for the determination of the response of masonry walls under blast overpressure often rely on oversimplifying and conservative assumptions, which, although justifiable for design purposes, are not as warranted when fragility analysis and risk assessment are the objectives. In addition, due to the composite nature of reinforced masonry construction, the evaluation of multivariate fragility functions may likely require significant computational effort, owing to the multiplicity of variables describing the constituent materials and their associated uncertainty. The problem is further compounded by the effects of the high strain rates typically induced by blast loading, which make the understanding of masonry behaviour even more challenging; although efforts are being made in order to account for strain rate effects at the macro-scale, no well established models are available for reinforced masonry walls. Therefore, in order to perform accurate yet expedient fragility analyses that can effectively capture rate dependent phenomena, a dynamic model based on single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) approach is developed. The SDOF model accounts for the nonlinear stress–strain behaviour obtained from standard prism tests and integrates strain rate dependent formulations provided in the open literature. The model predictions are corroborated using data—including pressure and displacement histories—from field testing of six scaled concrete block walls subjected to the detonation of live explosives. Within the scope of the current study, the proposed model is found to be a reasonable trade-off between computational efficiency and numerical accuracy and is an improvement upon a basic SDOF approach, which is typically based on the fixed dynamic increase factors recommended by modern design standards and technical manuals for blast protection. The results presented in this study are expected to contribute to the ongoing development of a comprehensive framework for the probabilistic risk assessment of structures subjected to explosive loading.