Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Analysis of atmospheric turbidity for daylight calculations
AbstractA large set of illuminance and irradiance data has been collected for four years at 15-minute intervals in San Francisco. This data set has been used to investigate the impact of atmospheric turbidity on daylight calculations. Existing predictive formulae for Linke turbidity, , provide moderate agreement to measured values of when using nominal design values for the Ångström scattering coefficient, β, and precipitable water vapor, w. When average measured values for β and w are used, the agreement improves. We suggest the use of an illuminance turbidity, Til, to calculate direct normal illuminance directly. We derive a simple approximate solution, Til = 1 + 21.6 β. Til appears to be a better parameter to describe atmospheric conditions since, unlike , it is insensitive to air mass and thus solar altitude or time of day. We present and compare plots of Til and vs. solar altitude, time of day, and month. Finally, we examine and compare several alternative pathways to derive direct normal illuminance from irradiance and luminous efficacy (dependent on β and w), or directly from β.
Analysis of atmospheric turbidity for daylight calculations
AbstractA large set of illuminance and irradiance data has been collected for four years at 15-minute intervals in San Francisco. This data set has been used to investigate the impact of atmospheric turbidity on daylight calculations. Existing predictive formulae for Linke turbidity, , provide moderate agreement to measured values of when using nominal design values for the Ångström scattering coefficient, β, and precipitable water vapor, w. When average measured values for β and w are used, the agreement improves. We suggest the use of an illuminance turbidity, Til, to calculate direct normal illuminance directly. We derive a simple approximate solution, Til = 1 + 21.6 β. Til appears to be a better parameter to describe atmospheric conditions since, unlike , it is insensitive to air mass and thus solar altitude or time of day. We present and compare plots of Til and vs. solar altitude, time of day, and month. Finally, we examine and compare several alternative pathways to derive direct normal illuminance from irradiance and luminous efficacy (dependent on β and w), or directly from β.
Analysis of atmospheric turbidity for daylight calculations
Navvab, M. (Autor:in) / Karayel, M. (Autor:in) / Ne'eman, E. (Autor:in) / Selkowitz, S. (Autor:in)
Energy and Buildings ; 6 ; 293-303
01.01.1984
11 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Daylight needs and daylight calculations
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
|Basis of daylight calculations
Engineering Index Backfile | 1946
|Atmospheric turbidity over Egypt
Elsevier | 2003
|Practical daylight calculations for vertical windows
Engineering Index Backfile | 1926
|Daylight, artificial light and artificial daylight
Engineering Index Backfile | 1928
|