Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Kinematic hardening rules for modeling uniaxial and multiaxial ratcheting
AbstractRatcheting, which is the strain accumulation observed under the unsymmetrical stress controlled loading and non-proportional loadings, is modeled using the simplified viscoplasticity theory based on overstress (VBO). The influences of kinematic hardening laws on the uniaxial and multiaxial non-proportional ratcheting behavior of CS 1026 carbon steel have been investigated. The following kinematic hardening rules have been considered: the classical kinematic hardening rule, the kinematic hardening rules introduced by Armstrong–Frederick, Burlet–Cailletaud and the modified Burlet–Cailletaud. The investigated loading conditions include uniaxial stress controlled test with non-zero mean stress, and axial strain controlled cyclic test of thin-walled tubular specimen in the presence of constant pressure. Numerical results are compared with the experimental data obtained by Hassan and Kyriakides [Hassan T, Kyriakides S. Ratcheting in cyclic plasticity, part I: uniaxial behavior. Int J Plast 1992;8:91–116] and Hassan et al. [Hassan T, Corona E, Kyriakides S. Ratcheting in cyclic plasticity, part I: multiaxial behavior. Int J Plast 1992;8:117–146]. It is observed that all investigated kinematic hardening rules do not improve ratcheting behavior under multiaxial loading, but over-prediction still exists.
Kinematic hardening rules for modeling uniaxial and multiaxial ratcheting
AbstractRatcheting, which is the strain accumulation observed under the unsymmetrical stress controlled loading and non-proportional loadings, is modeled using the simplified viscoplasticity theory based on overstress (VBO). The influences of kinematic hardening laws on the uniaxial and multiaxial non-proportional ratcheting behavior of CS 1026 carbon steel have been investigated. The following kinematic hardening rules have been considered: the classical kinematic hardening rule, the kinematic hardening rules introduced by Armstrong–Frederick, Burlet–Cailletaud and the modified Burlet–Cailletaud. The investigated loading conditions include uniaxial stress controlled test with non-zero mean stress, and axial strain controlled cyclic test of thin-walled tubular specimen in the presence of constant pressure. Numerical results are compared with the experimental data obtained by Hassan and Kyriakides [Hassan T, Kyriakides S. Ratcheting in cyclic plasticity, part I: uniaxial behavior. Int J Plast 1992;8:91–116] and Hassan et al. [Hassan T, Corona E, Kyriakides S. Ratcheting in cyclic plasticity, part I: multiaxial behavior. Int J Plast 1992;8:117–146]. It is observed that all investigated kinematic hardening rules do not improve ratcheting behavior under multiaxial loading, but over-prediction still exists.
Kinematic hardening rules for modeling uniaxial and multiaxial ratcheting
Colak, Ozgen U. (Autor:in)
19.11.2007
7 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Kinematic hardening rules for modeling uniaxial and multiaxial ratcheting
| British Library Online Contents | 2008
Kinematic hardening rules in uncoupled modeling for multiaxial ratcheting simulation
| British Library Online Contents | 2001
Modified kinematic hardening rule for multiaxial ratcheting prediction
| British Library Online Contents | 2004
On the Ohno-Wang kinematic hardening rules for multiaxial ratcheting modeling of medium carbon steel
| British Library Online Contents | 2005
Ratcheting of cyclically hardening and softening materials: II. Multiaxial behavior
| British Library Online Contents | 1994