Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Residential Demand Flexibility: Modeling Occupant Behavior using Sociodemographic Predictors
Highlights Framework predicts large-scale residential behavior from public demographic data. 13 critical sociodemographic factors influence residential demand flexibility temporal behavior. Peoples’ energy end-use patterns differ significantly by sociodemography. There is a potential for differential user targeting to improve demand flexibility participation.
Abstract Demand flexibility (DF) has the potential to increase the saturation of renewables in the grid and reduce operating costs for both utilities and customers. However, less than 8% of U.S. residential electric customers are enrolled in DF programs. A major research gap on this topic is an uneven understanding of behavioral drivers of electricity use and DF program participation at the household level. In this study, we employ machine learning models to predict residential occupant behavior in activities relevant to DF. We model occupants’ extensive decisions (i.e., choice of action) and intensive behaviors (i.e., amount of time spent) during peak and off-peak time periods using the publicly available American Time Use Survey, which includes activities data for approximately 200,000 respondents. In our machine learning models, predictions for both extensive and intensive behavior fell within a ±20% error margin at the aggregate level. We identify 13 key sociodemographic predictors of DF-related intensive behavior using LASSO inference and beta coefficient ranking. However, these top predictors differ by activity, suggesting potential scope for differential user targeting for DF events and technologies during program design. This work also contributes to understanding when and who might adopt these DF technologies based on their daily routine activities.
Residential Demand Flexibility: Modeling Occupant Behavior using Sociodemographic Predictors
Highlights Framework predicts large-scale residential behavior from public demographic data. 13 critical sociodemographic factors influence residential demand flexibility temporal behavior. Peoples’ energy end-use patterns differ significantly by sociodemography. There is a potential for differential user targeting to improve demand flexibility participation.
Abstract Demand flexibility (DF) has the potential to increase the saturation of renewables in the grid and reduce operating costs for both utilities and customers. However, less than 8% of U.S. residential electric customers are enrolled in DF programs. A major research gap on this topic is an uneven understanding of behavioral drivers of electricity use and DF program participation at the household level. In this study, we employ machine learning models to predict residential occupant behavior in activities relevant to DF. We model occupants’ extensive decisions (i.e., choice of action) and intensive behaviors (i.e., amount of time spent) during peak and off-peak time periods using the publicly available American Time Use Survey, which includes activities data for approximately 200,000 respondents. In our machine learning models, predictions for both extensive and intensive behavior fell within a ±20% error margin at the aggregate level. We identify 13 key sociodemographic predictors of DF-related intensive behavior using LASSO inference and beta coefficient ranking. However, these top predictors differ by activity, suggesting potential scope for differential user targeting for DF events and technologies during program design. This work also contributes to understanding when and who might adopt these DF technologies based on their daily routine activities.
Residential Demand Flexibility: Modeling Occupant Behavior using Sociodemographic Predictors
Olawale, Opeoluwa Wonuola (Autor:in) / Gilbert, Ben (Autor:in) / Reyna, Janet (Autor:in)
Energy and Buildings ; 262
17.02.2022
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Elsevier | 2024
|Occupant-behavior driven appliance scheduling for residential buildings
Springer Verlag | 2017
|Occupant-behavior driven appliance scheduling for residential buildings
Online Contents | 2017
|Modeling occupant behavior of the manual control of windows in residential buildings
Wiley | 2019
|