Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Developing rural insights for building age-friendly communities
Abstract Notwithstanding a few exceptions, the global age-friendly literature remains mostly silent on the problem of the longer-term, sustainable implementation of age-friendly initiatives. This paper seeks to address this gap by presenting rural insights from a multi-site case study in Ontario, Canada, that considers the influence of unique, rural community contexts that may differentially impact parameters of success and longer-term sustainability among rural age-friendly programs. Findings from interviews with 46 age-friendly leaders across five rural communities demonstrate that contextual community factors directly affected rural age-friendly sustainability. Specifically, the presence of social connectivity (sense of community) created an opportunity for age-friendly sustainability, whereas a lack of geographic connectivity (jurisdictional fragmentation) presented a challenge. These contextual insights demonstrate an additional pathway to rural age-friendly sustainability – considering the social and jurisdictional level of age-friendly implementation prior to initial development, a pathway which reinforces the need for a specifically rural age-friendly agenda that supports rural older adults.
Highlights Rural communities’ social and geographic connectivity influences age-friendly sustainability. Opportunities to rural age-friendly implementation and sustainability is associated with sense of community. Jurisdictional fragmentation within rural communities can challenge age-friendly implementation and sustainability. Rural insights indicate the need to articulate a specifically rural age-friendly agenda.
Developing rural insights for building age-friendly communities
Abstract Notwithstanding a few exceptions, the global age-friendly literature remains mostly silent on the problem of the longer-term, sustainable implementation of age-friendly initiatives. This paper seeks to address this gap by presenting rural insights from a multi-site case study in Ontario, Canada, that considers the influence of unique, rural community contexts that may differentially impact parameters of success and longer-term sustainability among rural age-friendly programs. Findings from interviews with 46 age-friendly leaders across five rural communities demonstrate that contextual community factors directly affected rural age-friendly sustainability. Specifically, the presence of social connectivity (sense of community) created an opportunity for age-friendly sustainability, whereas a lack of geographic connectivity (jurisdictional fragmentation) presented a challenge. These contextual insights demonstrate an additional pathway to rural age-friendly sustainability – considering the social and jurisdictional level of age-friendly implementation prior to initial development, a pathway which reinforces the need for a specifically rural age-friendly agenda that supports rural older adults.
Highlights Rural communities’ social and geographic connectivity influences age-friendly sustainability. Opportunities to rural age-friendly implementation and sustainability is associated with sense of community. Jurisdictional fragmentation within rural communities can challenge age-friendly implementation and sustainability. Rural insights indicate the need to articulate a specifically rural age-friendly agenda.
Developing rural insights for building age-friendly communities
Russell, Elizabeth (Autor:in) / Skinner, Mark W. (Autor:in) / Colibaba, Amber (Autor:in)
Journal of Rural Studies ; 81 ; 336-344
29.10.2020
9 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Affordable Green Building in Rural Communities
NTIS | 2007
|Building structure of green and environment-friendly rural residential building
Europäisches Patentamt | 2020
|Eco-friendly Communities in Recycled Spaces: Environmental Behaviour in Rural Egypt
Springer Verlag | 2024
|Implementing sustainable water and sanitation projects in rural, developing communities
Online Contents | 2014
|