Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Viewpoint: Two more lamps. Augmenting urban planning for biodiversity
Abstract Parris et al.'s seven lamps (principles) of planning for biodiversity in the city (2018) provides a framework for achieving two objectives. Firstly, to alter the normative basis on which urban planning is predicated by integrating a concern for nonhuman inhabitants. Secondly, it argues for the greater enrolment of ecologists and the field of ecology within environmental planning. It seeks to encourage a paradigm-shift to reorient society on a more sustainable path by demonstrating that planning for more-than-human cities does not require a conceptual leap, rather it resonates with extant planning concerns. It thus takes a pragmatic approach to radical change. However, I argue that this framework as originally stated insufficiently considers the diversity of society or the field of ecology and entails an anthropocentric worldview. This undermines the lamps framework's radical agenda. I argue that this issue could be ameliorated by developing two further principles, Justice and Contact. Integrating these concerns into the lamps framework will strengthen its ability to contribute to efforts to transition society into a sustainable state.
Highlights Parris et al.’s urban planning principles for biodiversity are a pragmatic call for radical sustainability transformations. However, the diversity of society and the human-environmental relationships within are occluded. Efforts to engender a paradigm shift are undermined by an overly homogenous conceptualisation of society. Integrating two new lamps, Justice and Contact, may ameliorate this. A more multidisciplinary approach to biodiversity protection and urban planning is possible.
Viewpoint: Two more lamps. Augmenting urban planning for biodiversity
Abstract Parris et al.'s seven lamps (principles) of planning for biodiversity in the city (2018) provides a framework for achieving two objectives. Firstly, to alter the normative basis on which urban planning is predicated by integrating a concern for nonhuman inhabitants. Secondly, it argues for the greater enrolment of ecologists and the field of ecology within environmental planning. It seeks to encourage a paradigm-shift to reorient society on a more sustainable path by demonstrating that planning for more-than-human cities does not require a conceptual leap, rather it resonates with extant planning concerns. It thus takes a pragmatic approach to radical change. However, I argue that this framework as originally stated insufficiently considers the diversity of society or the field of ecology and entails an anthropocentric worldview. This undermines the lamps framework's radical agenda. I argue that this issue could be ameliorated by developing two further principles, Justice and Contact. Integrating these concerns into the lamps framework will strengthen its ability to contribute to efforts to transition society into a sustainable state.
Highlights Parris et al.’s urban planning principles for biodiversity are a pragmatic call for radical sustainability transformations. However, the diversity of society and the human-environmental relationships within are occluded. Efforts to engender a paradigm shift are undermined by an overly homogenous conceptualisation of society. Integrating two new lamps, Justice and Contact, may ameliorate this. A more multidisciplinary approach to biodiversity protection and urban planning is possible.
Viewpoint: Two more lamps. Augmenting urban planning for biodiversity
Singleton, Benedict E. (Autor:in)
Cities ; 141
15.07.2023
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Urban development: Urban planning viewpoint
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
Viewpoint Re-evaluating the place of urban planning history
| Online Contents | 2015
| British Library Online Contents | 2002