Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation
CORRIGENDUM
In our discussion of the use of global warming potential (GWP) values in the Howarth et al (2011) paper, our text implies that the GISS group's 2009 and 2010 papers (Shindell et al 2009 and Unger et al 2010) were contradictory. Such an interpretation does not reflect the conclusions of those papers and was not our intention. First, the 2009 and 2010 papers address GWP and radiative forcing, respectively. Our intentions in that paragraph were (a) to illustrate the possible ways that the GWP and radiative forcing discussions in the scientific community were misapplied to lifecycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from unconventional gas extraction, and (b) to underscore that the reasonable questions about GWP raised by Shindell et al (2009) are a justification for retaining a broader, rather than narrower, range of GWP possibilities for this calculation.
References
Howarth R W, Santoro R and Ingraffea A 2011 Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations Clim. Change Lett. 106 679–90
Shindell D T, Faluvegi G, Koch D M, Schmidt G A, Unger N and Bauer S E 2009 Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions Science 326 716–8
Unger N, Bond T C, Wang J S, Koch D M, Menon S, Shindell D T and Bauer S E 2010 Attribution of climate forcing to economic sectors Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107 3382–7
The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation
CORRIGENDUM
In our discussion of the use of global warming potential (GWP) values in the Howarth et al (2011) paper, our text implies that the GISS group's 2009 and 2010 papers (Shindell et al 2009 and Unger et al 2010) were contradictory. Such an interpretation does not reflect the conclusions of those papers and was not our intention. First, the 2009 and 2010 papers address GWP and radiative forcing, respectively. Our intentions in that paragraph were (a) to illustrate the possible ways that the GWP and radiative forcing discussions in the scientific community were misapplied to lifecycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from unconventional gas extraction, and (b) to underscore that the reasonable questions about GWP raised by Shindell et al (2009) are a justification for retaining a broader, rather than narrower, range of GWP possibilities for this calculation.
References
Howarth R W, Santoro R and Ingraffea A 2011 Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations Clim. Change Lett. 106 679–90
Shindell D T, Faluvegi G, Koch D M, Schmidt G A, Unger N and Bauer S E 2009 Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions Science 326 716–8
Unger N, Bond T C, Wang J S, Koch D M, Menon S, Shindell D T and Bauer S E 2010 Attribution of climate forcing to economic sectors Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107 3382–7
The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation
CORRIGENDUM
Nathan Hultman (Autor:in) / Dylan Rebois (Autor:in) / Michael Scholten (Autor:in) / Christopher Ramig (Autor:in)
Environmental Research Letters ; 6 ; 049504
01.12.2011
1 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation
| IOP Institute of Physics | 2011
Greenhouse gas mitigation and rural electricity generation by a novel two-stroke biogas engine
| BASE | 2021
Sunlight greenhouse utilizing solar gas flow to generate electricity
| Europäisches Patentamt | 2015