Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Repeatability of Testing Procedures for Resilient Modulus and Fatigue
Extensive use of diametral resilient modulus and fatigue testing is made by the Oregon State Highway Division to evaluate asphaltic concrete materials. Test results on similar materials (e.g., adjacent field cores), however, often indicate a poor level of repeatability. In the study, laboratory fabricated briquettes were tested to evaluate the repeatability of the diametral modulus test at two laboratories, Oregon State Highway Division (OSHD) and Oregon State University (OSU), and the repeatability of the fatigue test at a single laboratory (OSU). Modulus tests at the OSHD laboratory were conducted at one temperature and three strain levels while modulus tests at the OSU laboratory were conducted at two temperatures and the same three strain levels. Fatigue testing at the OSU laboratory was conducted at two temperatures and at one initial strain level. Significant findings include modulus tests are highly repeatable within each laboratory, modulus tests under similar test conditions could not be satisfactorily reproduced (at the 5% significance level) between laboratories; depending on test conditions, fatigue tests had a very low to high level of repeatability.
Repeatability of Testing Procedures for Resilient Modulus and Fatigue
Extensive use of diametral resilient modulus and fatigue testing is made by the Oregon State Highway Division to evaluate asphaltic concrete materials. Test results on similar materials (e.g., adjacent field cores), however, often indicate a poor level of repeatability. In the study, laboratory fabricated briquettes were tested to evaluate the repeatability of the diametral modulus test at two laboratories, Oregon State Highway Division (OSHD) and Oregon State University (OSU), and the repeatability of the fatigue test at a single laboratory (OSU). Modulus tests at the OSHD laboratory were conducted at one temperature and three strain levels while modulus tests at the OSU laboratory were conducted at two temperatures and the same three strain levels. Fatigue testing at the OSU laboratory was conducted at two temperatures and at one initial strain level. Significant findings include modulus tests are highly repeatable within each laboratory, modulus tests under similar test conditions could not be satisfactorily reproduced (at the 5% significance level) between laboratories; depending on test conditions, fatigue tests had a very low to high level of repeatability.
Repeatability of Testing Procedures for Resilient Modulus and Fatigue
T. Scholz (Autor:in) / R. G. Hicks (Autor:in) / L. Scholl (Autor:in)
1989
56 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Repeatability of the Resilient Modulus Test Procedure
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2003
Resilient Modulus Testing of Lean Emulsified Bases
| British Library Online Contents | 1996
Strain-controlled testing for subgrade resilient modulus
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001
Resilient Modulus Testing of Lean Emulsified Bases
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996