Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Seismic Rehabilitation of Framed Buildings Infilled with Unreinforced Masonry Walls Using Post-Tensioned Steel Braces
Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the seismic performance of URM buildings and framed buildings with URM infills based on a discussion of their performance during previous EQGMs and of recent research results obtained worldwide. Chapter 2 describes the mechanical properties and dynamic characteristics of an existing RC framed building with URM infills located in the Los Angeles urban area. In Chapter 3, the desirable performances associated with different levels of EQGMs are discussed for framed buildings with URM infills. The seismic performance of the upgraded building is assessed by means of linear and nonlinear analyses. Finally, in Chapter 4 some observations, conclusions and recommendations are presented, with emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of using PT braces to upgrade existing framed buildings with URM infills. Appendix A describes how the seismic input (corresponding to the safety level EQGM) for the design of the Post-tensioned (PT) braces upgrading scheme was established.
Seismic Rehabilitation of Framed Buildings Infilled with Unreinforced Masonry Walls Using Post-Tensioned Steel Braces
Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the seismic performance of URM buildings and framed buildings with URM infills based on a discussion of their performance during previous EQGMs and of recent research results obtained worldwide. Chapter 2 describes the mechanical properties and dynamic characteristics of an existing RC framed building with URM infills located in the Los Angeles urban area. In Chapter 3, the desirable performances associated with different levels of EQGMs are discussed for framed buildings with URM infills. The seismic performance of the upgraded building is assessed by means of linear and nonlinear analyses. Finally, in Chapter 4 some observations, conclusions and recommendations are presented, with emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of using PT braces to upgrade existing framed buildings with URM infills. Appendix A describes how the seismic input (corresponding to the safety level EQGM) for the design of the Post-tensioned (PT) braces upgrading scheme was established.
Seismic Rehabilitation of Framed Buildings Infilled with Unreinforced Masonry Walls Using Post-Tensioned Steel Braces
A. Teran-Gilmore (Autor:in) / V. V. Bertero (Autor:in) / N. Youssef (Autor:in)
1995
283 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Construction Materials, Components, & Equipment , Structural Analyses , Construction Equipment, Materials, & Supplies , Frame structures , Retrofitting , Earthquake resistance , Steel structures , Beams(Structural) , Columns(Supports) , Reinforcing steels , Bracing , Reinforced concrete , Masonry , Vibration damping , Structural vibration , Dynamic structural analysis , Dynamic response , Stiffness , Mechanical properties , Buildings , Earthquake engineering , URM(Unreinforced Masonry) , EQGM(Earthquake Ground Motion)
Seismic Rehabilitation of Infilled Non-Ductile Frame Buildings Using Post-Tensioned Steel Braces
Online Contents | 1996
|Rehabilitation of infilled non-ductile frames with post-tensioned steel braces
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|SEISMIC REHABILITATION OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY WALLS
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
|Seismic Rehabilitation of Unreinforced Masonry Shear Walls
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|SEISMIC REHABILITATION OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY SHEAR WALLS
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001
|