Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Distribution of Room Size in Hospitals
Room sizes in six teaching hospitals in the United Kingdom were analyzed to determine the extent to which each hospital's physical accommodations were unique to its particular functions and to examine the assertion that the provision of a generalized and highly useful stock of rooms leads to larger and wasteful buildings. The six hospitals were distinct in design and ranged in size from 116,000 square feet to 850,000 square feet. Room size distributions were plotted in histogram form, in 5-square-foot intervals. Data were then analyzed in terms of common room sizes. The six most common room sizes ranged from 40 square feet to 120 square feet and accounted for over half of the rooms in the study hospitals. The findings tended to support the contention that hospital planning may be susceptible to at least a certain extent of variety reduction and naturalization. To test the validity of dimensional coordination in simplifying the planning, design, and building process and in facilitating the standardization of building components, room size data were used to determine if two typical planning modules would result in an increase in the size of the six hospitals if they were replanned according to the modules. It was found that strict adherence to either module, with no reduction in specified room areas, would result in an average increase in total building area of between 6 percent and 12 percent. With a 10-percent tolerance on room areas, however, it was determined that the use of such modules would not lead to an increase in total hospital size. Graphs and tables illustrate the study.
Distribution of Room Size in Hospitals
Room sizes in six teaching hospitals in the United Kingdom were analyzed to determine the extent to which each hospital's physical accommodations were unique to its particular functions and to examine the assertion that the provision of a generalized and highly useful stock of rooms leads to larger and wasteful buildings. The six hospitals were distinct in design and ranged in size from 116,000 square feet to 850,000 square feet. Room size distributions were plotted in histogram form, in 5-square-foot intervals. Data were then analyzed in terms of common room sizes. The six most common room sizes ranged from 40 square feet to 120 square feet and accounted for over half of the rooms in the study hospitals. The findings tended to support the contention that hospital planning may be susceptible to at least a certain extent of variety reduction and naturalization. To test the validity of dimensional coordination in simplifying the planning, design, and building process and in facilitating the standardization of building components, room size data were used to determine if two typical planning modules would result in an increase in the size of the six hospitals if they were replanned according to the modules. It was found that strict adherence to either module, with no reduction in specified room areas, would result in an average increase in total building area of between 6 percent and 12 percent. With a 10-percent tolerance on room areas, however, it was determined that the use of such modules would not lead to an increase in total hospital size. Graphs and tables illustrate the study.
Distribution of Room Size in Hospitals
J. Weeks (Autor:in) / G. Best (Autor:in) / J. Cheyne (Autor:in) / E. Leopold (Autor:in)
1976
14 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Health Care Technology , Biomedical Instrumentation & Bioengineering , Design , Foreign countries , Guidelines , HRP/AA , HRP/HH , HRP/MD , HRP/ZB , HRPGEO/YFO , HRPOCC/XHA , HRPOCC/XJ , Health care facilities , Health care technology , Health occupations , Health planning , Health resources , Hospitals , Methodology , Objectives , Policies , Reprints , Revisions , Rooms , Size
Engineering Index Backfile | 1948
Designing Inclusive Places: Four hospitals that take care to make room for all
British Library Online Contents | 1999
Online Contents | 1993
Engineering Index Backfile | 1952