Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Comparisons of Structure-Dependent Explicit Methods for Time Integration
Chang explicit method (CEM)1,2 and CR explicit method3 (CRM) are two structure-dependent explicit methods that have been successfully developed for structural dynamics. The most important property of both integration methods is that they involve no nonlinear iterations in addition to unconditional stability and second-order accuracy. Thus, they are very computationally efficient for solving inertial problems, where the total response is dominated by low frequency modes. However, an unusual overshooting behavior for CR explicit method is identified herein and thus its practical applications might be largely limited although its velocity computing for each time step is much easier than for the CEM.
Comparisons of Structure-Dependent Explicit Methods for Time Integration
Chang explicit method (CEM)1,2 and CR explicit method3 (CRM) are two structure-dependent explicit methods that have been successfully developed for structural dynamics. The most important property of both integration methods is that they involve no nonlinear iterations in addition to unconditional stability and second-order accuracy. Thus, they are very computationally efficient for solving inertial problems, where the total response is dominated by low frequency modes. However, an unusual overshooting behavior for CR explicit method is identified herein and thus its practical applications might be largely limited although its velocity computing for each time step is much easier than for the CEM.
Comparisons of Structure-Dependent Explicit Methods for Time Integration
Chang, Shuenn-Yih (Autor:in)
2015
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
Improving Explicit Time Integration by Modal Truncation Techniques
Online Contents | 1998
|Comparative study of numerical explicit time integration algorithms
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|