Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Foundation underpinning by means of piles
Conclusions Jacked piles are more economical than bored—injection piles both in labor and material costs. Unlike bored—injection piles, they are installed with prestressing. It is advisable to place the jacked plies at distances of 5 m from each other, and to use reinforced concrete for the wall beams.
Foundation underpinning by means of piles
Conclusions Jacked piles are more economical than bored—injection piles both in labor and material costs. Unlike bored—injection piles, they are installed with prestressing. It is advisable to place the jacked plies at distances of 5 m from each other, and to use reinforced concrete for the wall beams.
Foundation underpinning by means of piles
Gendel', É. M. (Autor:in)
1991
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
Lokalklassifikation TIB:
770/6545/8000
BKL:
56.20
Ingenieurgeologie, Bodenmechanik
A comparison of underpinning by piles and foundation enlargement
British Library Conference Proceedings
|Conventional piles in underpinning
Springer Verlag | 1993
|Underpinning of buildings by means of jet grouted piles
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
|Underpinning of buildings by means of jet grouted piles
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001
|Underpinning with Steel Pipe Piles
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
|