Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Geoid determination using adapted reference field, seismic Moho depths and variable density contrast
Abstract. The traditional remove-restore technique for geoid computation suffers from two main drawbacks. The first is the assumption of an isostatic hypothesis to compute the compensation masses. The second is the double consideration of the effect of the topographic–isostatic masses within the data window through removing the reference field and the terrain reduction process. To overcome the first disadvantage, the seismic Moho depths, representing, more or less, the actual compensating masses, have been used with variable density anomalies computed by employing the topographic–isostatic mass balance principle. In order to avoid the double consideration of the effect of the topographic–isostatic masses within the data window, the effect of these masses for the used fixed data window, in terms of potential coefficients, has been subtracted from the reference field, yielding an adapted reference field. This adapted reference field has been used for the remove–restore technique. The necessary harmonic analysis of the topographic–isostatic potential using seismic Moho depths with variable density anomalies is given. A wide comparison among geoids computed by the adapted reference field with both the Airy–Heiskanen isostatic model and seismic Moho depths with variable density anomaly and a geoid computed by the traditional remove–restore technique is made. The results show that using seismic Moho depths with variable density anomaly along with the adapted reference field gives the best relative geoid accuracy compared to the GPS/levelling geoid.
Geoid determination using adapted reference field, seismic Moho depths and variable density contrast
Abstract. The traditional remove-restore technique for geoid computation suffers from two main drawbacks. The first is the assumption of an isostatic hypothesis to compute the compensation masses. The second is the double consideration of the effect of the topographic–isostatic masses within the data window through removing the reference field and the terrain reduction process. To overcome the first disadvantage, the seismic Moho depths, representing, more or less, the actual compensating masses, have been used with variable density anomalies computed by employing the topographic–isostatic mass balance principle. In order to avoid the double consideration of the effect of the topographic–isostatic masses within the data window, the effect of these masses for the used fixed data window, in terms of potential coefficients, has been subtracted from the reference field, yielding an adapted reference field. This adapted reference field has been used for the remove–restore technique. The necessary harmonic analysis of the topographic–isostatic potential using seismic Moho depths with variable density anomalies is given. A wide comparison among geoids computed by the adapted reference field with both the Airy–Heiskanen isostatic model and seismic Moho depths with variable density anomaly and a geoid computed by the traditional remove–restore technique is made. The results show that using seismic Moho depths with variable density anomaly along with the adapted reference field gives the best relative geoid accuracy compared to the GPS/levelling geoid.
Geoid determination using adapted reference field, seismic Moho depths and variable density contrast
Abd-Elmotaal, H. A. (Autor:in) / Kühtreiber, N. (Autor:in)
Journal of Geodesy ; 77
2003
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
BKL:
38.73
Geodäsie
Implementing Seismic Moho Depths in Geoid Computation
Online Contents | 2003
|Moho Depths versus Gravity Anomalies
Online Contents | 1999
|Vening Meinesz Moho Depths and their Approximations
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
|Geoid model determination for the Hellenic area “Hellas Geoid 2023”
Online Contents | 2023
|Geoid determination using one-step integration
Online Contents | 2003
|