Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Closing the case on closure in Cole's model
Abstract. In his response to Closure in Cole's Reformulated Leontief Model (Jackson et al. 1997) Cole presents the mechanics of his solution. His spreadsheet demonstration of the model, however, fails to fully address the conceptual issues and model specification concerns raised in our critique. His demonstration does enable us to provide a sorely needed formalization that pinpoints the inconsistencies in his model. While we join with Cole in urging modellers to strive for clarity, transparency, and utility, we caution against allowing these goals to cause us to lose sight of internal consistency requirements.
Closing the case on closure in Cole's model
Abstract. In his response to Closure in Cole's Reformulated Leontief Model (Jackson et al. 1997) Cole presents the mechanics of his solution. His spreadsheet demonstration of the model, however, fails to fully address the conceptual issues and model specification concerns raised in our critique. His demonstration does enable us to provide a sorely needed formalization that pinpoints the inconsistencies in his model. While we join with Cole in urging modellers to strive for clarity, transparency, and utility, we caution against allowing these goals to cause us to lose sight of internal consistency requirements.
Closing the case on closure in Cole's model
Jackson, Randall W. (Autor:in) / Madden, Moss (Autor:in)
1999
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
BKL:
74.12
Stadtgeographie, Siedlungsgeographie
Closing the case on closure in Cole's model
Online Contents | 1999
|Closure In Cole's Reformulated Leontief Model
Online Contents | 1997
|Lessons from the debate on Cole's model closure
Online Contents | 2000
|Lessons from the debate on Cole's model closure
Online Contents | 2000
|The phantom of the matrix: Inverting the case on closure in Cole's model
Online Contents | 1999
|