Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
On a stronger-than-best property for best prediction
Abstract The minimum mean squared error (MMSE) criterion is a popular criterion for devising best predictors. In case of linear predictors, it has the advantage that no further distributional assumptions need to be made, other then about the first- and second-order moments. In the spatial and Earth sciences, it is the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) that is used most often. Despite the fact that in this case only the first- and second-order moments need to be known, one often still makes statements about the complete distribution, in particular when statistical testing is involved. For such cases, one can do better than the BLUP, as shown in Teunissen (J Geod. doi: 10.1007/s00190-007-0140-6, 2006), and thus devise predictors that have a smaller MMSE than the BLUP. Hence, these predictors are to be preferred over the BLUP, if one really values the MMSE-criterion. In the present contribution, we will show, however, that the BLUP has another optimality property than the MMSE-property, provided that the distribution is Gaussian. It will be shown that in the Gaussian case, the prediction error of the BLUP has the highest possible probability of all linear unbiased predictors of being bounded in the weighted squared norm sense. This is a stronger property than the often advertised MMSE-property of the BLUP.
On a stronger-than-best property for best prediction
Abstract The minimum mean squared error (MMSE) criterion is a popular criterion for devising best predictors. In case of linear predictors, it has the advantage that no further distributional assumptions need to be made, other then about the first- and second-order moments. In the spatial and Earth sciences, it is the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) that is used most often. Despite the fact that in this case only the first- and second-order moments need to be known, one often still makes statements about the complete distribution, in particular when statistical testing is involved. For such cases, one can do better than the BLUP, as shown in Teunissen (J Geod. doi: 10.1007/s00190-007-0140-6, 2006), and thus devise predictors that have a smaller MMSE than the BLUP. Hence, these predictors are to be preferred over the BLUP, if one really values the MMSE-criterion. In the present contribution, we will show, however, that the BLUP has another optimality property than the MMSE-property, provided that the distribution is Gaussian. It will be shown that in the Gaussian case, the prediction error of the BLUP has the highest possible probability of all linear unbiased predictors of being bounded in the weighted squared norm sense. This is a stronger property than the often advertised MMSE-property of the BLUP.
On a stronger-than-best property for best prediction
Teunissen, P. J. G. (Autor:in)
Journal of Geodesy ; 82
2007
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
On a stronger-than-best property for best prediction
| Online Contents | 2007
British Library Online Contents | 2003
| IuD Bahn | 2013
Pavement cores stronger than test cylinders
Engineering Index Backfile | 1931
STREET CLEANSING - Making customers count -- When best value is about more than best vehicles
| Online Contents | 2002