Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Mechanical behavior of CFRP confined low strength concretes subjected to simultaneous heating–cooling cycles and sustained loading
Abstract This study aims to present the mechanical behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) reinforced low strength cylindrical and prism concrete specimens under both heating–cooling cycles and sustained loading. Heating–cooling cycles range from −10 to 50°C and the applied sustained load level is 40% of the ultimate strength of concrete. After 200 heating–cooling cycles and/or sustained load testing, specimens were tested to determine the mechanical behavior under uniaxial compression. The experimental test results show that heating–cooling cycles alone have insignificant effect on the mechanical properties of CFRP-wrapped specimens. However, as for simultaneous exposure of sustained loading and heating–cooling cycles the main difference is on the shape of the stress–strain diagram, in which the bilinear response becomes clear. The other difference is on the ultimate strain, which decreases up to 29 and 15% for cylindrical and prismatic specimens, respectively.
Mechanical behavior of CFRP confined low strength concretes subjected to simultaneous heating–cooling cycles and sustained loading
Abstract This study aims to present the mechanical behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) reinforced low strength cylindrical and prism concrete specimens under both heating–cooling cycles and sustained loading. Heating–cooling cycles range from −10 to 50°C and the applied sustained load level is 40% of the ultimate strength of concrete. After 200 heating–cooling cycles and/or sustained load testing, specimens were tested to determine the mechanical behavior under uniaxial compression. The experimental test results show that heating–cooling cycles alone have insignificant effect on the mechanical properties of CFRP-wrapped specimens. However, as for simultaneous exposure of sustained loading and heating–cooling cycles the main difference is on the shape of the stress–strain diagram, in which the bilinear response becomes clear. The other difference is on the ultimate strain, which decreases up to 29 and 15% for cylindrical and prismatic specimens, respectively.
Mechanical behavior of CFRP confined low strength concretes subjected to simultaneous heating–cooling cycles and sustained loading
Erdil, B. (Autor:in) / Akyuz, U. (Autor:in) / Yaman, I. O. (Autor:in)
2011
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
British Library Online Contents | 2012
|Residual mechanical properties of high strength concretes subjected to high temperature cycles
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|