Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Is spatial distribution of China’s population excessively unequal? A cross-country comparison
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-4815
Abstract This study explores whether China’s population distribution is excessively biased toward large cities or coastal regions. The test is based on a fixed effects model estimated from a 5-year panel dataset for 101 countries, and two spatial inequality measures are computed from $$0.25^{\circ }\times 0.25^{\circ }$$ population grids for a parallel cross-country comparison. The results show that the spatial Gini coefficient for China does not deviate from a general trend, while Moran’s I index is biased upward. This suggests that the spatial inequality of China’s population distribution tends to be more obvious at the regional level than at the city level.
Is spatial distribution of China’s population excessively unequal? A cross-country comparison
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-4815
Abstract This study explores whether China’s population distribution is excessively biased toward large cities or coastal regions. The test is based on a fixed effects model estimated from a 5-year panel dataset for 101 countries, and two spatial inequality measures are computed from $$0.25^{\circ }\times 0.25^{\circ }$$ population grids for a parallel cross-country comparison. The results show that the spatial Gini coefficient for China does not deviate from a general trend, while Moran’s I index is biased upward. This suggests that the spatial inequality of China’s population distribution tends to be more obvious at the regional level than at the city level.
Is spatial distribution of China’s population excessively unequal? A cross-country comparison
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-4815
Abstract This study explores whether China’s population distribution is excessively biased toward large cities or coastal regions. The test is based on a fixed effects model estimated from a 5-year panel dataset for 101 countries, and two spatial inequality measures are computed from $$0.25^{\circ }\times 0.25^{\circ }$$ population grids for a parallel cross-country comparison. The results show that the spatial Gini coefficient for China does not deviate from a general trend, while Moran’s I index is biased upward. This suggests that the spatial inequality of China’s population distribution tends to be more obvious at the regional level than at the city level.
Is spatial distribution of China’s population excessively unequal? A cross-country comparison
Nam, Kyung-Min (Autor:in)
2017
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
BKL:
83.64$jRegionalwirtschaft
/
74.12
Stadtgeographie, Siedlungsgeographie
/
38.00$jGeowissenschaften: Allgemeines
/
38.00
Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines
/
83.64
Regionalwirtschaft
/
74.12$jStadtgeographie$jSiedlungsgeographie
RVK:
ELIB39
/
ELIB18
/
ELIB45
Lokalklassifikation FBW:
oek 4450
Is spatial distribution of China’s population excessively unequal? A cross-country comparison
| Online Contents | 2017
Excessively minimal Minimalism
British Library Online Contents | 1998
REVIEW - Excessively minimal Minimalism
Online Contents | 1998
Local regulation may be excessively stringent
| Online Contents | 1999
Diagnosis and Repair of Excessively Emitting Vehicles
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1996