Anatomy and behaviour of a post-eruptive rain lahar triggered by a typhoon on Mayon volcano, Philippines: Fid-Bau Portal

Anatomy and behaviour of a post-eruptive rain lahar triggered by a typhoon on Mayon volcano, Philippines

Rodolfo, K. S. / Arguden, A. T. / Solidum, R. U. / Umbal, J. V.

Abstract Mayon Volcano in the Philippines, one the world's most active, is situated in a moist, tropical-maritime climate with frequent typhoons. A third of Mayon's eruptions generate destructive lahars (volcanic debris flows and hyperconcentrated streamflows). Lahars also occur during quiescent periods when monsoons and typhoons deliver rains of appropriate intensity and duration to the loose debris on the volcano slopes. Both eruption- and post-eruptive lahars occur most frequently during the typhoon-prone October–December season of the Northeast Monsoon. Post-eruptive lahars, the most poorly documented, are exemplified by a debris-flow event triggered by Saling, a typhoon of only moderate intensity, that occurred in Mabinit Channel on the southeast Mayon flank on October 17–18, 1985, one year after the last Mayon eruption. Detailed pre- and post-Saling surveys docment channel deepening of up to 4 m and maximum lateral erosion of 66 m. The debris flows left prominent, discontinuous multi-level terraces along the length of Mabinit Channel, either from pulsations due to temporary channel blockage, or as levee deposits. A significant volume of debris overtopped channel bends at 250–200 m elevations, coalescing to cover a 200,000 $ m^{2} $ area of 4.5° slope with bouldery lateral deposits 1 m thick on the average. Channelized flows below this level plugged 0.5 km of the original channel and replaced it with a new conduit of comparable size. The Saling debris-flow deposits have a remarkably uniform sand-silt mode and less prominent, more variable modes in the pebble-boulder range. Shear strengths of the lateral flows ranged from 0.46×$ 10^{4} $ to 2.32×$ 10^{4} $ dn $ cm^{−2} $; those of the channelized flows at the plug were significantly higher. Reconstructed flow velocity was 3.8 m $ sec^{−1} $.