Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
A Critical Comparison of Regression Models and Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Ground Vibrations
Abstract Blasting is important and an essential prerequisite in any opencast mine for fragmenting hard deposits. Blasting always produces unwanted effects like ground vibrations, noise and fly rock; among which ground vibrations effect is more on surrounding structures. Propagation of ground vibrations can lead to destruction of surrounding structures. Prediction of ground vibrations especially in terms of peak particle velocity is beneficial as opposed to conventional data monitoring techniques which can be expensive as well as time consuming. This paper uses predictors to estimate the intensity of ground vibrations and compares different methods of prediction methods like linear regression, multiple linear regression, non linear regression (NLR) and artificial neural networks. Intensity of ground vibrations generated from blasting operations was monitored in three different mines of limestone, dolomite and coal; obtaining about 168 ground vibration recordings in total. The statistical modelling or data-driven modeling has shown promise in the prediction of blast vibrations. Proposed a system of introducing site specific rock parameters like poison’s ratio, uniaxial compressive strength of rock and Young’s modulus to improve the correlation coefficient using statistical modelling (commonly called feature engineering in machine learning circles).
A Critical Comparison of Regression Models and Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Ground Vibrations
Abstract Blasting is important and an essential prerequisite in any opencast mine for fragmenting hard deposits. Blasting always produces unwanted effects like ground vibrations, noise and fly rock; among which ground vibrations effect is more on surrounding structures. Propagation of ground vibrations can lead to destruction of surrounding structures. Prediction of ground vibrations especially in terms of peak particle velocity is beneficial as opposed to conventional data monitoring techniques which can be expensive as well as time consuming. This paper uses predictors to estimate the intensity of ground vibrations and compares different methods of prediction methods like linear regression, multiple linear regression, non linear regression (NLR) and artificial neural networks. Intensity of ground vibrations generated from blasting operations was monitored in three different mines of limestone, dolomite and coal; obtaining about 168 ground vibration recordings in total. The statistical modelling or data-driven modeling has shown promise in the prediction of blast vibrations. Proposed a system of introducing site specific rock parameters like poison’s ratio, uniaxial compressive strength of rock and Young’s modulus to improve the correlation coefficient using statistical modelling (commonly called feature engineering in machine learning circles).
A Critical Comparison of Regression Models and Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Ground Vibrations
Ram Chandar, K. (Autor:in) / Sastry, V. R. (Autor:in) / Hegde, Chiranth (Autor:in)
2016
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
BKL:
57.00$jBergbau: Allgemeines
/
38.58
Geomechanik
/
57.00
Bergbau: Allgemeines
/
56.20
Ingenieurgeologie, Bodenmechanik
/
38.58$jGeomechanik
/
56.20$jIngenieurgeologie$jBodenmechanik
British Library Online Contents | 2017
|The use of artificial neural networks to predict ground movements caused by tunneling
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2009
|Using Artificial Neural Network to Predict Blast-Induced Ground Vibration
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012
|