Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Acoustic Emission Response Mechanism of Hydraulic Fracturing in Different Coal and Rock: A Laboratory Study
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4596-6725
Abstract To examine the influence of lithology on the microseismic response mechanism during the process of coal and rock hydraulic fracturing (HF), we selected four lithological samples of coal, sandstone, shale, and mudstone, which are commonly found in coal-measure strata. The acoustic emission (AE) cumulative counts, AE energy, crack classification, AE peak frequency, and AE position of the four samples under natural conditions were studied, and the laws of crack propagation and evolution in the process of coal and rock HF were explained. We discovered the phenomenon of “bimodal frequency bands” during the HF of coal and rock samples. The results showed that the pressure curves and AE cumulative counts of the coal samples exhibited the largest fluctuations. The power-law distribution of AE energy has a discrete effect in the high-energy region and a plateau effect in the low-energy region. The AE energy power-law indexes of the mudstone samples are the largest, with the values of 0.64 and 0.61, whereas those of the shale samples are the smallest, with the values of 0.44 and 0.45. The crack classification of the samples of coal is mainly shear cracks, and the crack classification of the samples of sandstone, shale and mudstone is mainly tensile cracks. It is proposed to regard frequency band II as the dominant frequency band for HF in the coal, sandstone, and mudstone samples and frequency band I as the dominant frequency band for HF in shale samples.
Highlights The phenomenon of “bimodal frequency bands” during hydraulic fracturing of coal and rock samples was discovered.The AE energy power-law indexes and damage patterns during hydraulic fracturing of coal and rock were revealed.The dominant frequency bands of different coal and rock rupture were found.
Acoustic Emission Response Mechanism of Hydraulic Fracturing in Different Coal and Rock: A Laboratory Study
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4596-6725
Abstract To examine the influence of lithology on the microseismic response mechanism during the process of coal and rock hydraulic fracturing (HF), we selected four lithological samples of coal, sandstone, shale, and mudstone, which are commonly found in coal-measure strata. The acoustic emission (AE) cumulative counts, AE energy, crack classification, AE peak frequency, and AE position of the four samples under natural conditions were studied, and the laws of crack propagation and evolution in the process of coal and rock HF were explained. We discovered the phenomenon of “bimodal frequency bands” during the HF of coal and rock samples. The results showed that the pressure curves and AE cumulative counts of the coal samples exhibited the largest fluctuations. The power-law distribution of AE energy has a discrete effect in the high-energy region and a plateau effect in the low-energy region. The AE energy power-law indexes of the mudstone samples are the largest, with the values of 0.64 and 0.61, whereas those of the shale samples are the smallest, with the values of 0.44 and 0.45. The crack classification of the samples of coal is mainly shear cracks, and the crack classification of the samples of sandstone, shale and mudstone is mainly tensile cracks. It is proposed to regard frequency band II as the dominant frequency band for HF in the coal, sandstone, and mudstone samples and frequency band I as the dominant frequency band for HF in shale samples.
Highlights The phenomenon of “bimodal frequency bands” during hydraulic fracturing of coal and rock samples was discovered.The AE energy power-law indexes and damage patterns during hydraulic fracturing of coal and rock were revealed.The dominant frequency bands of different coal and rock rupture were found.
Acoustic Emission Response Mechanism of Hydraulic Fracturing in Different Coal and Rock: A Laboratory Study
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4596-6725
Abstract To examine the influence of lithology on the microseismic response mechanism during the process of coal and rock hydraulic fracturing (HF), we selected four lithological samples of coal, sandstone, shale, and mudstone, which are commonly found in coal-measure strata. The acoustic emission (AE) cumulative counts, AE energy, crack classification, AE peak frequency, and AE position of the four samples under natural conditions were studied, and the laws of crack propagation and evolution in the process of coal and rock HF were explained. We discovered the phenomenon of “bimodal frequency bands” during the HF of coal and rock samples. The results showed that the pressure curves and AE cumulative counts of the coal samples exhibited the largest fluctuations. The power-law distribution of AE energy has a discrete effect in the high-energy region and a plateau effect in the low-energy region. The AE energy power-law indexes of the mudstone samples are the largest, with the values of 0.64 and 0.61, whereas those of the shale samples are the smallest, with the values of 0.44 and 0.45. The crack classification of the samples of coal is mainly shear cracks, and the crack classification of the samples of sandstone, shale and mudstone is mainly tensile cracks. It is proposed to regard frequency band II as the dominant frequency band for HF in the coal, sandstone, and mudstone samples and frequency band I as the dominant frequency band for HF in shale samples.
Highlights The phenomenon of “bimodal frequency bands” during hydraulic fracturing of coal and rock samples was discovered.The AE energy power-law indexes and damage patterns during hydraulic fracturing of coal and rock were revealed.The dominant frequency bands of different coal and rock rupture were found.
Acoustic Emission Response Mechanism of Hydraulic Fracturing in Different Coal and Rock: A Laboratory Study
Li, Quangui (Autor:in) / Qian, Yanan (Autor:in) / Hu, Qianting (Autor:in) / Jiang, Zhizhong (Autor:in) / Xu, Yangcheng (Autor:in) / Shang, Xueyi (Autor:in) / Ling, Faping (Autor:in) / Liu, Ronghui (Autor:in) / Li, Wenxi (Autor:in)
2022
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
BKL:
38.58
Geomechanik
/
56.20
Ingenieurgeologie, Bodenmechanik
/
38.58$jGeomechanik
/
56.20$jIngenieurgeologie$jBodenmechanik
RVK:
ELIB41
Acoustic emission activities in hydraulic fracturing of coal measure rock
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
Acoustic Emission Response of Laboratory Hydraulic Fracturing in Layered Shale
| Online Contents | 2018
Acoustic Emission Response of Laboratory Hydraulic Fracturing in Layered Shale
| Online Contents | 2018
Study on Acoustic Emission-Resistivity Response of Hydraulic Fracturing in Rock-Like Samples
| Springer Verlag | 2025
Hydraulic Fracturing of Heterogeneous Rock Monitored by Acoustic Emission
| Online Contents | 2015