Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
A multi-case institutional analysis of water–energy–food nexus governance
Water–energy–food (WEF) nexus governance provides a framework for integrating across resource systems. However, there has been limited examination of WEF nexus governance in practice and a need for comparison of different WEF nexus governance systems. Thus, this study seeks to understand the institutional structure of WEF nexus governance in practice to create cross-cutting themes of the structures that lend themselves towards integrated WEF nexus governance. We conducted an institutional analysis of a multi-case study using interviews and document analysis for three cities: Phoenix, Cape Town, and Singapore. Institutional analysis allows us to examine the multiple levels of governance between water, energy, and food actors in the cities. The results of our study show that WEF nexus governance is limited in practice, but still present. However, the specific structure of this WEF nexus governance is different for each individual city. We identify three cross-cutting themes for WEF nexus governance that may be helpful for nexus governance in practice: horizontal coordination within institutional levels, overcoming challenges of scalar fit for coordination across WEF nexus sectors, and the contribution of bottom-up participation for fully integrated WEF nexus governance.
A multi-case institutional analysis of water–energy–food nexus governance
Water–energy–food (WEF) nexus governance provides a framework for integrating across resource systems. However, there has been limited examination of WEF nexus governance in practice and a need for comparison of different WEF nexus governance systems. Thus, this study seeks to understand the institutional structure of WEF nexus governance in practice to create cross-cutting themes of the structures that lend themselves towards integrated WEF nexus governance. We conducted an institutional analysis of a multi-case study using interviews and document analysis for three cities: Phoenix, Cape Town, and Singapore. Institutional analysis allows us to examine the multiple levels of governance between water, energy, and food actors in the cities. The results of our study show that WEF nexus governance is limited in practice, but still present. However, the specific structure of this WEF nexus governance is different for each individual city. We identify three cross-cutting themes for WEF nexus governance that may be helpful for nexus governance in practice: horizontal coordination within institutional levels, overcoming challenges of scalar fit for coordination across WEF nexus sectors, and the contribution of bottom-up participation for fully integrated WEF nexus governance.
A multi-case institutional analysis of water–energy–food nexus governance
Sustain Sci
Jones-Crank, J. Leah (Autor:in)
Sustainability Science ; 19 ; 1277-1291
01.07.2024
15 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Water–energy–food nexus , Institutional analysis , Network of adjacent action situations , Governance , Urban sustainability Environment , Environmental Management , Climate Change Management and Policy , Environmental Economics , Landscape Ecology , Sustainable Development , Public Health , Earth and Environmental Science
DOAJ | 2017
|A Normative-Institutional to Water-Energy Nexus: A Case Analysis of Brazil
BASE | 2021
|Online Contents | 2016
|Wiley | 2021
|