Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Abstract Decks, interior beams, edge beams, and girders are parts of a steel floor system. If the deck is optimized without considering beam optimization, finding the best result is simple. However, a deck with a higher cost may increase the composite action of the beams and decrease the beam cost, thus reducing the total expense. Also, a different number of floor divisions can improve the total floor cost. Increasing beam capacity by using castellated beams is another efficient cost-saving method. In this study, floor optimization is performed and these three issues are discussed. Floor division number and deck sections are some of the variables. Also, for each beam, profile section of the beam, beam-cutting depth, cutting angle, spacing between holes, and number of filled holes at the ends of castellated beams are other variables. Constraints include the application of stress, stability, deflection, and vibration limitations according to the load and resistance factor (LRFD) design. The objective function is the total cost of the floor consisting of the steel profile, cutting and welding, concrete, steel deck, shear stud, and construction costs. Optimization is performed by enhanced colliding bodies optimization (ECBO). Results show that using castellated beams, selecting a deck with a higher price and considering the different number of floor divisions can decrease the total cost of the floor (Kaveh and Ghafari [1]).
Abstract Decks, interior beams, edge beams, and girders are parts of a steel floor system. If the deck is optimized without considering beam optimization, finding the best result is simple. However, a deck with a higher cost may increase the composite action of the beams and decrease the beam cost, thus reducing the total expense. Also, a different number of floor divisions can improve the total floor cost. Increasing beam capacity by using castellated beams is another efficient cost-saving method. In this study, floor optimization is performed and these three issues are discussed. Floor division number and deck sections are some of the variables. Also, for each beam, profile section of the beam, beam-cutting depth, cutting angle, spacing between holes, and number of filled holes at the ends of castellated beams are other variables. Constraints include the application of stress, stability, deflection, and vibration limitations according to the load and resistance factor (LRFD) design. The objective function is the total cost of the floor consisting of the steel profile, cutting and welding, concrete, steel deck, shear stud, and construction costs. Optimization is performed by enhanced colliding bodies optimization (ECBO). Results show that using castellated beams, selecting a deck with a higher price and considering the different number of floor divisions can decrease the total cost of the floor (Kaveh and Ghafari [1]).
Optimum Design of Steel Floor Systems Using ECBO
Kaveh, A. (Autor:in)
02.12.2016
20 pages
Aufsatz/Kapitel (Buch)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Optimal Seismic Design of Steel Plate Shear Walls Using CBO and ECBO Algorithms
Springer Verlag | 2020
|Optimal Design of Double-Layer Domes Considering Different Mechanical Systems via ECBO
Springer Verlag | 2018
|Optimal Design of the Monopole Structures Using the CBO and ECBO Algorithms
Springer Verlag | 2016
|Optimal Design of Double-Layer Barrel Vaults Using CBO and ECBO Algorithms
Springer Verlag | 2016
|Optimal Design of Double-Layer Barrel Vaults Using CBO and ECBO Algorithms
Springer Verlag | 2016
|