Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Geosynthetic Encased Granular Column in Soft Soil Improvement by Numerical Method and Field Experiment
The Unit cell model is used to research the effectiveness of geosynthetic encased granular column (GEC) for VIFONE II factory area at LONG AN province, VIET NAM in soft ground improvement. Settlement of ground is determined by applying Plaxis 2D simulation software; from that, computed results by Plaxis 2D is analyzed, compared with the field monitoring results. Research results show that in case of granular column without geosynthetic, as using “Soft soil” model, resulted data by Plaxis are approximately similar to those observed from field monitoring with an error of 8.3% up to 22.8%. As applying geosynthetic encased granular column (GEC) in case of loading less than 100 kPa, the difference of settlement between ground reinforced by granular column and by GEC is not significant, only from 0.2% up to 3.2%. The difference of settlement of ground reinforced by granular column with and without geosynthetic reduces from 15.1% to 6.8% corresponding to loading from 400 kPa to 800 kPa.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Geosynthetic Encased Granular Column in Soft Soil Improvement by Numerical Method and Field Experiment
The Unit cell model is used to research the effectiveness of geosynthetic encased granular column (GEC) for VIFONE II factory area at LONG AN province, VIET NAM in soft ground improvement. Settlement of ground is determined by applying Plaxis 2D simulation software; from that, computed results by Plaxis 2D is analyzed, compared with the field monitoring results. Research results show that in case of granular column without geosynthetic, as using “Soft soil” model, resulted data by Plaxis are approximately similar to those observed from field monitoring with an error of 8.3% up to 22.8%. As applying geosynthetic encased granular column (GEC) in case of loading less than 100 kPa, the difference of settlement between ground reinforced by granular column and by GEC is not significant, only from 0.2% up to 3.2%. The difference of settlement of ground reinforced by granular column with and without geosynthetic reduces from 15.1% to 6.8% corresponding to loading from 400 kPa to 800 kPa.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Geosynthetic Encased Granular Column in Soft Soil Improvement by Numerical Method and Field Experiment
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
Reddy, J. N. (Herausgeber:in) / Wang, Chien Ming (Herausgeber:in) / Luong, Van Hai (Herausgeber:in) / Le, Anh Tuan (Herausgeber:in) / Le, Quan (Autor:in) / Vo, Dai Nhat (Autor:in) / Phu, Nhat Truyen (Autor:in)
The International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering and Architecture ; 2023 ; Da Nang City, Vietnam
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering and Architecture ; Kapitel: 120 ; 1142-1149
12.12.2023
8 pages
Aufsatz/Kapitel (Buch)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Geosynthetic encased columns for soft soil improvement
| TIBKAT | 2019
Settlement analysis of geosynthetic encased granular column treated soft clay deposits
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2020
Improvement of soft soil by geosynthetic-encapsulated granular column
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
Numerical analysis of geosynthetic encased stone column
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation
| Online Contents | 2006