Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Adaptive Thermal Comfort Models for Buildings
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-8589
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6719-8793
Thermal comfort has been widely studied from the middle of the twentieth century to the present. From Fanger’s model based on the neutral thermal state and the development of the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD) indexes to the adaptive approach based on buildings that operate with natural ventilation, several studies set detailed conditions with strengths and limitations. In this chapter, a review from the international to the specific comfort models is established. In this sense, ASHRAE 55-2017 and EN 16798-1:2019 are the two most used models; both are based on international research projects with large databases. The two models present similarities in terms of applicability, however, some differences are analyzed (e.g., categories considered). In an intermediary state, various countries like the Netherlands (ISSO 74) and China (GB/T50785) have developed specific adaptive thermal comfort models, which present sensible differences with the international standards. Moreover, local studies are carried out in Australia, Chile, India, and Romania, regarding specific building types (e.g., social dwellings in Chile) or for certain climate conditions. To sum up, many research studies at different levels of resolution have presented the potential of adaptive thermal comfort models, to better understand the users’ adaptability.
Adaptive Thermal Comfort Models for Buildings
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-8589
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6719-8793
Thermal comfort has been widely studied from the middle of the twentieth century to the present. From Fanger’s model based on the neutral thermal state and the development of the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD) indexes to the adaptive approach based on buildings that operate with natural ventilation, several studies set detailed conditions with strengths and limitations. In this chapter, a review from the international to the specific comfort models is established. In this sense, ASHRAE 55-2017 and EN 16798-1:2019 are the two most used models; both are based on international research projects with large databases. The two models present similarities in terms of applicability, however, some differences are analyzed (e.g., categories considered). In an intermediary state, various countries like the Netherlands (ISSO 74) and China (GB/T50785) have developed specific adaptive thermal comfort models, which present sensible differences with the international standards. Moreover, local studies are carried out in Australia, Chile, India, and Romania, regarding specific building types (e.g., social dwellings in Chile) or for certain climate conditions. To sum up, many research studies at different levels of resolution have presented the potential of adaptive thermal comfort models, to better understand the users’ adaptability.
Adaptive Thermal Comfort Models for Buildings
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-8589
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6719-8793
Thermal comfort has been widely studied from the middle of the twentieth century to the present. From Fanger’s model based on the neutral thermal state and the development of the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD) indexes to the adaptive approach based on buildings that operate with natural ventilation, several studies set detailed conditions with strengths and limitations. In this chapter, a review from the international to the specific comfort models is established. In this sense, ASHRAE 55-2017 and EN 16798-1:2019 are the two most used models; both are based on international research projects with large databases. The two models present similarities in terms of applicability, however, some differences are analyzed (e.g., categories considered). In an intermediary state, various countries like the Netherlands (ISSO 74) and China (GB/T50785) have developed specific adaptive thermal comfort models, which present sensible differences with the international standards. Moreover, local studies are carried out in Australia, Chile, India, and Romania, regarding specific building types (e.g., social dwellings in Chile) or for certain climate conditions. To sum up, many research studies at different levels of resolution have presented the potential of adaptive thermal comfort models, to better understand the users’ adaptability.
Adaptive Thermal Comfort Models for Buildings
SpringerBriefs in Architectural Design and Technology
Bienvenido-Huertas, David (Autor:in) / Rubio-Bellido, Carlos (Autor:in)
Adaptive Thermal Comfort of Indoor Environment for Residential Buildings ; Kapitel: 2 ; 13-33
01.04.2021
21 pages
Aufsatz/Kapitel (Buch)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Thermal comfort , Adaptive comfort , ASHRAE 55-2017 , EN 16798-1:2019 , Natural ventilation , Climate adaption Energy , Sustainable Architecture/Green Buildings , Energy Policy, Economics and Management , Building Types and Functions , Engineering Thermodynamics, Heat and Mass Transfer , Building Construction and Design
Application of Adaptive Thermal Comfort Models for Energy Saving in Buildings
| Springer Verlag | 2021
Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings
| Online Contents | 2002
Adaptive comfort control conditioned buildings
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
Thermal Comfort Field Study Based on Adaptive Comfort Theory in Non-residential Buildings
| Springer Verlag | 2016