Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Place and Disadvantage: The Need for Reflexive Epistemology in Spatial Social Science
The relationship between place and disadvantage, and particularly the question of whether, and how, geographical concentration of disadvantaged households exacerbates disadvantage is of growing concern to social science and urban policy. Despite many calls for a subtle and complex approach to constructing knowledge about these issues, a positivist approach based on statistical indicators, appears to dominate policy making. This approach reifies place and distracts attention from strategies which might effectively address disadvantage at the local level. This article describes two examples of small area redevelopment where such an approach has been used to suggest that redevelopment and dispersal of public housing concentrations are in the interests of current residents, whose lives would be improved through replacement of existing housing forms with more diverse, or at least tenure-mixed, suburbs. Yet the process by which this improvement will occur is yet to be explicated or even adequately theorised by spatial social science. The indicators used to measure the ‘success’ of redevelopment, such as small area employment, education and crime statistics, are likely to reveal little about the impact of such projects on the lives of the individuals most affected. A more reflexive and ‘deeply engaged’ research methodology is called for.
Place and Disadvantage: The Need for Reflexive Epistemology in Spatial Social Science
The relationship between place and disadvantage, and particularly the question of whether, and how, geographical concentration of disadvantaged households exacerbates disadvantage is of growing concern to social science and urban policy. Despite many calls for a subtle and complex approach to constructing knowledge about these issues, a positivist approach based on statistical indicators, appears to dominate policy making. This approach reifies place and distracts attention from strategies which might effectively address disadvantage at the local level. This article describes two examples of small area redevelopment where such an approach has been used to suggest that redevelopment and dispersal of public housing concentrations are in the interests of current residents, whose lives would be improved through replacement of existing housing forms with more diverse, or at least tenure-mixed, suburbs. Yet the process by which this improvement will occur is yet to be explicated or even adequately theorised by spatial social science. The indicators used to measure the ‘success’ of redevelopment, such as small area employment, education and crime statistics, are likely to reveal little about the impact of such projects on the lives of the individuals most affected. A more reflexive and ‘deeply engaged’ research methodology is called for.
Place and Disadvantage: The Need for Reflexive Epistemology in Spatial Social Science
Darcy, Michael (Autor:in)
Urban Policy and Research ; 25 ; 347-361
01.09.2007
15 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Knowing through relations. On the Epistemology and Methodology of Being a Reflexive Insider
| DOAJ | 2018
Anticipating Precarity and Risk in Social Innovation Design for Entrenched Place-Based Disadvantage
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2019
The spatial context of transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being
| Online Contents | 2011
Measurement of Social Disadvantage and its Spatial Articulation in the Republic of Ireland
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2007