Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Generative methods in urban design: a progress assessment
The year 2007 marked the 20‐year anniversary of A New Theory of Urban Design (1987), a slender volume by Christopher Alexander and colleagues that serves as a notable milepost within the half‐century old “design methods movement” in which Alexander himself played a seminal role. The “generative” design method of A New Theory focused less upon the specification of a final form through schematic planning, and more on the stepwise process by which a form might emerge from the evolutionary actions of a group of collaborators. In so doing, it challenged the notion of “design” as a progressive expression of schematic intentions, and argued for a conception of design as a stepwise, non‐linear evolution in response to a series of contextual urban factors. In the 20 years since, significant progress has been made to develop the insights of generativity in urban design, as in other fields. Some of Alexander’s ideas have been incorporated – notably by practitioners of The New Urbanism – and some have been challenged and dismissed, including, notably, by Alexander himself. The author assesses progress since this milepost volume – substantial, he argues – as well as setbacks and shortcomings, and significant opportunities still remaining.
Generative methods in urban design: a progress assessment
The year 2007 marked the 20‐year anniversary of A New Theory of Urban Design (1987), a slender volume by Christopher Alexander and colleagues that serves as a notable milepost within the half‐century old “design methods movement” in which Alexander himself played a seminal role. The “generative” design method of A New Theory focused less upon the specification of a final form through schematic planning, and more on the stepwise process by which a form might emerge from the evolutionary actions of a group of collaborators. In so doing, it challenged the notion of “design” as a progressive expression of schematic intentions, and argued for a conception of design as a stepwise, non‐linear evolution in response to a series of contextual urban factors. In the 20 years since, significant progress has been made to develop the insights of generativity in urban design, as in other fields. Some of Alexander’s ideas have been incorporated – notably by practitioners of The New Urbanism – and some have been challenged and dismissed, including, notably, by Alexander himself. The author assesses progress since this milepost volume – substantial, he argues – as well as setbacks and shortcomings, and significant opportunities still remaining.
Generative methods in urban design: a progress assessment
Mehaffy, Michael W. (Autor:in)
01.03.2008
19 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Generative Urban Design Methods Based on Interactive Web Application
Springer Verlag | 2024
|Generative platform for urban and regional design
British Library Online Contents | 2007
|Generative platform for urban and regional design
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|Generative platform for urban and regional design
Online Contents | 2007
|Mathematical Generative Approach on Performance Based Urban Form Design
BASE | 2018
|