Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Some factors affecting coastal landscape aesthetic quality assessment
Seventy beaches in Wales, UK, were investigated with regard to quality of beach scenery using video panoramas. Scenic beauty was judged by three groups: coastal managers/academics; students in environmental sciences; and technical staff with no environmental training. Cloud cover at time of filming had a significant effect on scoring so a correction was applied for further data analysis. A strong preference was observed for undeveloped beaches over those where anthropogenic structures were prominent (p = 0.00), and for beaches with high relative relief. Beach commercialization level had an independent effect only on scores from the student group (p = 0.02). Results suggested that coastal managers/academics may assess beach landscape quality according to different criteria to those applied by people with no environmental training. Extreme scores did not seem to be well predicted by analysis of quantifiable landscape components and scores from the untrained judging group were also less predictable. The findings could contribute to coastal aesthetic resource management by demonstrating the feasibility of quantitatively assessing beach scenic quality for a large number of beaches. Identification, albeit tentative, of landscape parameters important in scenic quality assessment by various stakeholder groups could also contribute to the coastal management/planning process.
Some factors affecting coastal landscape aesthetic quality assessment
Seventy beaches in Wales, UK, were investigated with regard to quality of beach scenery using video panoramas. Scenic beauty was judged by three groups: coastal managers/academics; students in environmental sciences; and technical staff with no environmental training. Cloud cover at time of filming had a significant effect on scoring so a correction was applied for further data analysis. A strong preference was observed for undeveloped beaches over those where anthropogenic structures were prominent (p = 0.00), and for beaches with high relative relief. Beach commercialization level had an independent effect only on scores from the student group (p = 0.02). Results suggested that coastal managers/academics may assess beach landscape quality according to different criteria to those applied by people with no environmental training. Extreme scores did not seem to be well predicted by analysis of quantifiable landscape components and scores from the untrained judging group were also less predictable. The findings could contribute to coastal aesthetic resource management by demonstrating the feasibility of quantitatively assessing beach scenic quality for a large number of beaches. Identification, albeit tentative, of landscape parameters important in scenic quality assessment by various stakeholder groups could also contribute to the coastal management/planning process.
Some factors affecting coastal landscape aesthetic quality assessment
Morgan, Robert (Autor:in)
Landscape Research ; 24 ; 167-184
01.07.1999
18 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Some Factors Affecting Coastal Landscape Aesthetic Quality Assessment
British Library Online Contents | 1999
|Some Factors Affecting Coastal Landscape Aesthetic Quality Assessment
Online Contents | 1999
|The aesthetic evaluation of coastal landscape
Springer Verlag | 2009
|Assessment of the visual aesthetic quality of the urban landscape in the Tabriz metropolis
DOAJ | 2022
|Research for Aesthetic and Visual Quality Management in Highway Landscape
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2013
|