Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Green building and policy innovation in the US Low-Income Housing Tax Credit programme
This article analyses the integration of green building with the largest low-income housing production programme in the US and the innovativeness of state housing agencies. Drawing on policy innovation literature, panel data and regression analysis are employed to quantify associations between state-level characteristics and the adoption of green building criteria into the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) programme. Results show that housing agencies have increasingly adopted green building criteria, and most have identified co-benefits from energy-efficient buildings and smart growth. Despite overall progress, the rate of adoption of green building criteria has decreased, few US states have comprehensive criteria, and many have dropped important criteria, such as on-site renewable energy generation, often due to perceived additional costs to developers and, in some cases, due to perceived progress in building codes. Results are consistent with hypotheses derived from the literature and suggest that the integration of green building with the LIHTC programme is significantly associated with the states’ internal factors, such as public housing agencies’ motivations and resources, and external factors like regional policy diffusion from other states. Future research should explore organization-level factors that affect environmental policy innovation.
Green building and policy innovation in the US Low-Income Housing Tax Credit programme
This article analyses the integration of green building with the largest low-income housing production programme in the US and the innovativeness of state housing agencies. Drawing on policy innovation literature, panel data and regression analysis are employed to quantify associations between state-level characteristics and the adoption of green building criteria into the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) programme. Results show that housing agencies have increasingly adopted green building criteria, and most have identified co-benefits from energy-efficient buildings and smart growth. Despite overall progress, the rate of adoption of green building criteria has decreased, few US states have comprehensive criteria, and many have dropped important criteria, such as on-site renewable energy generation, often due to perceived additional costs to developers and, in some cases, due to perceived progress in building codes. Results are consistent with hypotheses derived from the literature and suggest that the integration of green building with the LIHTC programme is significantly associated with the states’ internal factors, such as public housing agencies’ motivations and resources, and external factors like regional policy diffusion from other states. Future research should explore organization-level factors that affect environmental policy innovation.
Green building and policy innovation in the US Low-Income Housing Tax Credit programme
Yeganeh, Armin (Autor:in) / McCoy, Andrew P. (Autor:in) / Reichard, Georg (Autor:in) / Schenk, Todd (Autor:in) / Hankey, Steve (Autor:in)
Building Research & Information ; 49 ; 543-560
04.07.2021
18 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Building with credit: housing finance for low-income households
Online Contents | 1997
|The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit
British Library Online Contents | 1997
|Evaluating the Low‐Income Housing Tax Credit
Wiley | 1998
|Can Green Credit Policy Promote Firms’ Green Innovation? Evidence from China
DOAJ | 2022
|Input distortions in the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit: Evidence from building size
Online Contents | 2015
|