Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Reply to discussion ‘At one with systems' by D. Carmichael: why systems education is different
Carmichael’s discussion focusses on the education of Civil Engineering Systems practitioners, but any such aim requires a clear idea of the end product. There is an analogy between systems work and creativity. Do they rely on innate skill or can they be taught? I believe they can be taught, but the thinking processes needed require an approach radically different from the normal technique- and knowledge-focussed methods of most engineering teaching. A practice-focussed formality is required.
Reply to discussion ‘At one with systems' by D. Carmichael: why systems education is different
Carmichael’s discussion focusses on the education of Civil Engineering Systems practitioners, but any such aim requires a clear idea of the end product. There is an analogy between systems work and creativity. Do they rely on innate skill or can they be taught? I believe they can be taught, but the thinking processes needed require an approach radically different from the normal technique- and knowledge-focussed methods of most engineering teaching. A practice-focussed formality is required.
Reply to discussion ‘At one with systems' by D. Carmichael: why systems education is different
Elms, David (Autor:in)
Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems ; 38 ; 269-272
02.10.2021
4 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Discussion on ‘A framework for a civil engineering systems BOK’ by David Carmichael
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2021
|Australia approves Carmichael mine--again
Online Contents | 2015
Risk and its risks: discussion of 'Risk - a commentary' by D.G. Carmichael
Online Contents | 2017
|