Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Conflicting views on opposition to LULUs: distributive justice in three Japanese cases of waste disposal facility siting
Local residents often oppose some types of facilities because of their negative side effects, even though they are claimed to be necessary for the public good. These facilities are known as locally unwanted-land-uses, and local opposition to them is often referred to as not-in-my-backyard, usually with a pejorative connotation. However, some studies have challenged this conventional view of local opposition. Given these conflicting views, the present article explores how local mobilisation should be evaluated, focusing particularly on distributive justice. First, the study illuminates how different interpretations of distributive justice lead to difference in views on local opposition. Then, by comparing three waste disposal facility cases in Japan, a distinction between cost sharing and cost overlapping cases is illuminated. The study further develops discussions by pointing out the limits of using this distinction to evaluate local opposition movements and provides insights that can contribute to a fuller understanding of siting conflicts.
Conflicting views on opposition to LULUs: distributive justice in three Japanese cases of waste disposal facility siting
Local residents often oppose some types of facilities because of their negative side effects, even though they are claimed to be necessary for the public good. These facilities are known as locally unwanted-land-uses, and local opposition to them is often referred to as not-in-my-backyard, usually with a pejorative connotation. However, some studies have challenged this conventional view of local opposition. Given these conflicting views, the present article explores how local mobilisation should be evaluated, focusing particularly on distributive justice. First, the study illuminates how different interpretations of distributive justice lead to difference in views on local opposition. Then, by comparing three waste disposal facility cases in Japan, a distinction between cost sharing and cost overlapping cases is illuminated. The study further develops discussions by pointing out the limits of using this distinction to evaluate local opposition movements and provides insights that can contribute to a fuller understanding of siting conflicts.
Conflicting views on opposition to LULUs: distributive justice in three Japanese cases of waste disposal facility siting
Nakazawa, Takashi (Autor:in)
Local Environment ; 23 ; 846-860
03.08.2018
15 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
NIMBY or NiABY: a Logit Model of Opposition to Solid-waste-disposal Facility Siting
| Online Contents | 1994
Are LULUs still enduringly objectionable?
| British Library Online Contents | 2012
| Online Contents | 2000
A Methodology for Siting Waste Disposal Areas
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1992
Analytical Framework for Waste-Facility Siting
| Online Contents | 1995