Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Buoyancy-Corrected Gravimetric Analysis of Lightly Loaded Filters
Numerous sources of uncertainty are associated with the gravimetric analysis of lightly loaded air filter samples (<100 μg). The purpose of the study presented here is to investigate the effectiveness and limitations of air buoyancy corrections over experimentally adjusted conditions of temperature (21–25 °C) and relative humidity (RH) (16–60% RH). Conditioning (24 hr) and weighing were performed inside the Archimedes M3 environmentally controlled chamber. The measurements were performed using 20 size-fractionated samples of resuspended house dust loaded onto Teflo (PTFE) filters using a Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor representing a wide range of mass loading (7.2–3130 μg) and cut sizes (0.056–9.9 μm). By maintaining tight controls on humidity (within 0.5% RH of control setting) throughout pre- and postweighing at each stepwise increase in RH, it was possible to quantify error due to water absorption: 45% of the total mass change due to water absorption occurred between 16 and 50% RH, and 55% occurred between 50 and 60% RH. The buoyancy corrections ranged from −3.5 to +5.8 μg in magnitude and improved relative standard deviation (RSD) from 21.3% (uncorrected) to 5.6% (corrected) for a 7.2 μg sample. It is recommended that protocols for weighing low-mass particle samples (e.g., nanoparticle samples) should include buoyancy corrections and tight temperature/humidity controls. In some cases, conditioning times longer than 24 hr may be warranted.
Buoyancy-Corrected Gravimetric Analysis of Lightly Loaded Filters
Numerous sources of uncertainty are associated with the gravimetric analysis of lightly loaded air filter samples (<100 μg). The purpose of the study presented here is to investigate the effectiveness and limitations of air buoyancy corrections over experimentally adjusted conditions of temperature (21–25 °C) and relative humidity (RH) (16–60% RH). Conditioning (24 hr) and weighing were performed inside the Archimedes M3 environmentally controlled chamber. The measurements were performed using 20 size-fractionated samples of resuspended house dust loaded onto Teflo (PTFE) filters using a Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor representing a wide range of mass loading (7.2–3130 μg) and cut sizes (0.056–9.9 μm). By maintaining tight controls on humidity (within 0.5% RH of control setting) throughout pre- and postweighing at each stepwise increase in RH, it was possible to quantify error due to water absorption: 45% of the total mass change due to water absorption occurred between 16 and 50% RH, and 55% occurred between 50 and 60% RH. The buoyancy corrections ranged from −3.5 to +5.8 μg in magnitude and improved relative standard deviation (RSD) from 21.3% (uncorrected) to 5.6% (corrected) for a 7.2 μg sample. It is recommended that protocols for weighing low-mass particle samples (e.g., nanoparticle samples) should include buoyancy corrections and tight temperature/humidity controls. In some cases, conditioning times longer than 24 hr may be warranted.
Buoyancy-Corrected Gravimetric Analysis of Lightly Loaded Filters
Rasmussen, Pat E. (Autor:in) / Gardner, H. David (Autor:in) / Niu, Jianjun (Autor:in)
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ; 60 ; 1065-1077
01.09.2010
13 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Analysis of Deterioration Models for Lightly Loaded Thin Seal Flexible Pavements
British Library Online Contents | 2002
|Tribofilm formation of lightly loaded self mated alumina contacts
British Library Online Contents | 2012
|Maximizing Data Quality in the Gravimetric Analysis of Personal Exposure Sample Filters
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1999
|Behaviour of Coated and Uncoated Lightly Loaded Piles in Swelling Soils
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2009
|Online Contents | 2009
|