Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Why German homeowners are reluctant to retrofit
Germany is frequently seen as a leader in thermal retrofit policy, with stringent mandatory standards for insulation, windows and boilers. However, the annual rate and average depth of thermal retrofits are considerably lower than expected. One of the main policy planks for promoting thermal upgrades is the claim that thermal retrofitting, to federal standards, is always ‘economically viable’, i.e. it always pays back, through fuel savings, over the technical lifetime of the upgrade measures. Policy discourse therefore tends to blame homeowners for complacency or ignorance in failing to see the financial opportunity offered by retrofitting. However, a five-year in-depth study of the policy, buildings and occupants finds this policy is out of step with both the buildings and the majority of their owners. The policy's claimed ‘economic viability’ of retrofits fails to account for the real nature of the buildings and overstates the savings. The negative effect of misplaced claims of economic viability is considerable. Many thoughtful homeowners are deterred. It is argued that policy needs to change: more nuanced upgrade measures are needed that suit specific buildings and occupants; top-end retrofits can be promoted where appropriate and affordable, but for reasons other than economic gain.
Why German homeowners are reluctant to retrofit
Germany is frequently seen as a leader in thermal retrofit policy, with stringent mandatory standards for insulation, windows and boilers. However, the annual rate and average depth of thermal retrofits are considerably lower than expected. One of the main policy planks for promoting thermal upgrades is the claim that thermal retrofitting, to federal standards, is always ‘economically viable’, i.e. it always pays back, through fuel savings, over the technical lifetime of the upgrade measures. Policy discourse therefore tends to blame homeowners for complacency or ignorance in failing to see the financial opportunity offered by retrofitting. However, a five-year in-depth study of the policy, buildings and occupants finds this policy is out of step with both the buildings and the majority of their owners. The policy's claimed ‘economic viability’ of retrofits fails to account for the real nature of the buildings and overstates the savings. The negative effect of misplaced claims of economic viability is considerable. Many thoughtful homeowners are deterred. It is argued that policy needs to change: more nuanced upgrade measures are needed that suit specific buildings and occupants; top-end retrofits can be promoted where appropriate and affordable, but for reasons other than economic gain.
Why German homeowners are reluctant to retrofit
Galvin, Ray (Autor:in)
Building Research & Information ; 42 ; 398-408
04.07.2014
11 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Why German homeowners are reluctant to retrofit
Online Contents | 2014
|Why German homeowners are reluctant to retrofit
British Library Online Contents | 2014
|Why German homeowners are reluctant to retrofit
British Library Online Contents | 2014
|Knowledge Mapping of Homeowners’ Retrofit Behaviors: An Integrative Exploration
DOAJ | 2021
|Understanding homeowners’ renovation decisions resulting in low carbon retrofit
BASE | 2018
|