Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Spanning the globe for diversity: species selection in early nineteenth century United States botanical gardens
This research compared early nineteenth-century species lists from the Elgin Botanic Garden, New York; Cambridge Botanic Garden, Massachusetts; Botanick Garden of South-Carolina; Botanical Garden of Transylvania University, Kentucky; and Bartram’s Botanic Garden, Pennsylvania (two lists). Diversity was shown by more species being unique in each botanical garden than species common to the five botanical gardens. Global representation was demonstrated with species from all of the continents (excluding Antarctica) and the Cape of Good Hope region in the botanical gardens except the Botanick Garden of South-Carolina, which did not have Australian species. Only Bartram’s Botanic Garden US market list did not have twice as many species reported to be hardy in the New York City climate than species requiring a greenhouse. There were more herbaceous than woody plants in five of the six lists with the exception again being the Bartram’s Botanic Garden US market list. Among the uses agriculture, arts, diet, and medicine, only medicine comprised more than 25% of the species in the five botanical gardens except the Botanical Garden of Transylvania University. For all six lists, the historical information on hardiness and duration matched modern information for more than 75% of the species; however, native region matches were less than 75% for African species.
Spanning the globe for diversity: species selection in early nineteenth century United States botanical gardens
This research compared early nineteenth-century species lists from the Elgin Botanic Garden, New York; Cambridge Botanic Garden, Massachusetts; Botanick Garden of South-Carolina; Botanical Garden of Transylvania University, Kentucky; and Bartram’s Botanic Garden, Pennsylvania (two lists). Diversity was shown by more species being unique in each botanical garden than species common to the five botanical gardens. Global representation was demonstrated with species from all of the continents (excluding Antarctica) and the Cape of Good Hope region in the botanical gardens except the Botanick Garden of South-Carolina, which did not have Australian species. Only Bartram’s Botanic Garden US market list did not have twice as many species reported to be hardy in the New York City climate than species requiring a greenhouse. There were more herbaceous than woody plants in five of the six lists with the exception again being the Bartram’s Botanic Garden US market list. Among the uses agriculture, arts, diet, and medicine, only medicine comprised more than 25% of the species in the five botanical gardens except the Botanical Garden of Transylvania University. For all six lists, the historical information on hardiness and duration matched modern information for more than 75% of the species; however, native region matches were less than 75% for African species.
Spanning the globe for diversity: species selection in early nineteenth century United States botanical gardens
Loeb, Robert E. (Autor:in) / Walborn, Taylor N. (Autor:in) / Leasure, Alaina J. (Autor:in) / Manners, Joelle D. (Autor:in) / Massimino, Richard P. (Autor:in) / Mcgraw, Olivia A. (Autor:in)
Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes ; 42 ; 67-119
03.04.2022
53 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
| British Library Online Contents | 1996
Women, Gardens, and the English Middle Class in the Early Nineteenth Century
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
GARDENS OF THE NINETEENTH-CENTURY IMPERIAL PALACES IN ISTANBUL
| British Library Online Contents | 2003
Gardens of the nineteenth-century imperial palaces in Istanbul
| Online Contents | 2003
Gardens of the Gilded Age : Nineteenth-Century Gardens and Homegrounds of New York State
| TIBKAT | 1986