Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Modernising sustainable development? Standardisation, evidence and experts in local indicators
Taking inspiration from the forthcoming Rio+20 Conference in Brazil, this paper reflects upon the roles of power and knowledge in developing indicators for sustainable local development. Are indicators, the evidence they privilege, and the policies that follow from them consistent with the stated goals of sustainable development? Are they merely bureaucratic tick-boxes that enable the measurement of “progress”? Or, similarly, do they represent “knowledge modernization” whereby sustainable development can be measured objectively, like GDP? We will examine three points relating to these questions: (1) the increasing standardisation and mobility of sustainable development indicators; (2) the increasing prominence and types of “evidence” that inform sustainable development policy, and (3) the role of experts in determining the parameters of sustainable development. We argue that the development and use of indicators have become a technocratic practice that serves as a buffer between the “political” and the “rational” and thus de-politicises and restricts local sustainable development agendas, despite the inherently political nature of environmental problems and values.
Modernising sustainable development? Standardisation, evidence and experts in local indicators
Taking inspiration from the forthcoming Rio+20 Conference in Brazil, this paper reflects upon the roles of power and knowledge in developing indicators for sustainable local development. Are indicators, the evidence they privilege, and the policies that follow from them consistent with the stated goals of sustainable development? Are they merely bureaucratic tick-boxes that enable the measurement of “progress”? Or, similarly, do they represent “knowledge modernization” whereby sustainable development can be measured objectively, like GDP? We will examine three points relating to these questions: (1) the increasing standardisation and mobility of sustainable development indicators; (2) the increasing prominence and types of “evidence” that inform sustainable development policy, and (3) the role of experts in determining the parameters of sustainable development. We argue that the development and use of indicators have become a technocratic practice that serves as a buffer between the “political” and the “rational” and thus de-politicises and restricts local sustainable development agendas, despite the inherently political nature of environmental problems and values.
Modernising sustainable development? Standardisation, evidence and experts in local indicators
Elgert, Laureen (Autor:in) / Krueger, Rob (Autor:in)
Local Environment ; 17 ; 561-571
01.05.2012
11 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
A modernising leap forward?: DETR's mixed bag of 'modernising local government' papers
British Library Online Contents | 1998
|British Library Online Contents | 2012
Modernising Political Management in Local Government
Online Contents | 2000
|Online Contents | 2012
Modernising Britain's infrastructure
Emerald Group Publishing | 1987
|