Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Unconfined versus confined testing of geosynthetics
A theoretical explanation of the confined in-soil behaviour of geosynthetics is presented and compared to standard unconfined load-extension and creep test results. First, it is shown that confined, load-instantaneous geosynthetic extension problems can be successfully described by a pull-out model of a single geosynthetic reinforcement strip in soil. The confined in-soil stiffness of a geosynthetic is derived analytically as a function of the unconfined stiffness and the stiffness of the soil-geosyntetic strip interface. Second, the problem of confined in-soil creep is analysed on the basis of a similar model that takes into account the rheological properties of geosynthetics. Generally, it is shown that the confined in-soil behaviour of geosynthetics can be predicted on the basis of the unconfined properties of geosynthetics and the soil-geosynthetic strip interface stiffness. Practical examples show good agreement between the proposed models and the experimental data.
Unconfined versus confined testing of geosynthetics
A theoretical explanation of the confined in-soil behaviour of geosynthetics is presented and compared to standard unconfined load-extension and creep test results. First, it is shown that confined, load-instantaneous geosynthetic extension problems can be successfully described by a pull-out model of a single geosynthetic reinforcement strip in soil. The confined in-soil stiffness of a geosynthetic is derived analytically as a function of the unconfined stiffness and the stiffness of the soil-geosyntetic strip interface. Second, the problem of confined in-soil creep is analysed on the basis of a similar model that takes into account the rheological properties of geosynthetics. Generally, it is shown that the confined in-soil behaviour of geosynthetics can be predicted on the basis of the unconfined properties of geosynthetics and the soil-geosynthetic strip interface stiffness. Practical examples show good agreement between the proposed models and the experimental data.
Unconfined versus confined testing of geosynthetics
Ein Vergleich der Prüfung von geosynthetischen Materialien in ungebundenem und in Erde eingebundenem Zustand
Sawicki, A. (Autor:in) / Swidzinski, W. (Autor:in)
Geosynthetics International ; 6 ; 157-169
1999
13 Seiten, 9 Bilder, 6 Quellen
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
Confined creep testing of geosynthetics and MSB design
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|Confined-accelerated Creep Tests on Geosynthetics
Tema Archiv | 2013
|Abrasion testing of geosynthetics
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|Geosynthetics - Geosynthetics news
Online Contents | 2004