Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
How do crib tests produce contrary results?
The fabrics commonly known as Schedule 3 interlining fabrics are designed to pass the requirements of BS5852 part 2: 1982 as modified by Schedule 3, Clause 1 of the UKs Furniture and Furnishings (Fire) (Safety) Regulations 1988 S.I no. 1324, after water soak procedure specified by clause 4 of BS5651: 1978. Schedule 3 interlining fabrics may be inherently flame-retardant (FR), or may be chemically treated with a semi-durable FR treatment which is normally a water-soluble phosphate-urea complex, and is applied by a pad-dry-bake method. They are used as a barrier between upholstery foam and face fabric. Research of the treatment and testing of interlining fabrics has suggested a possible mechanism for unexpected failures and inconsistent results. Unexpected failures are the result of hot-spots of molten polyester which have collected in locations where the heat energy cannot escape. As a result of this research, a novel FR treatment has been devised, which has been formulated to overcome the shortcomings of current treatments for interlining fabrics. The Stephenson Speciality Chemicals FYRBAN C process exhibits the following benefits over traditional methods of producing Schedule 3 interlining fabrics: no fumes during processing, no yellowing of fabric, no loss of fabric strength, simple one-pass pad application, does not contain bromine or antimony, non-hazardous and biodegradable ingredients, very low opacity and fewer variables in processing. It is produced on an ISO 14001 accredited plant.
How do crib tests produce contrary results?
The fabrics commonly known as Schedule 3 interlining fabrics are designed to pass the requirements of BS5852 part 2: 1982 as modified by Schedule 3, Clause 1 of the UKs Furniture and Furnishings (Fire) (Safety) Regulations 1988 S.I no. 1324, after water soak procedure specified by clause 4 of BS5651: 1978. Schedule 3 interlining fabrics may be inherently flame-retardant (FR), or may be chemically treated with a semi-durable FR treatment which is normally a water-soluble phosphate-urea complex, and is applied by a pad-dry-bake method. They are used as a barrier between upholstery foam and face fabric. Research of the treatment and testing of interlining fabrics has suggested a possible mechanism for unexpected failures and inconsistent results. Unexpected failures are the result of hot-spots of molten polyester which have collected in locations where the heat energy cannot escape. As a result of this research, a novel FR treatment has been devised, which has been formulated to overcome the shortcomings of current treatments for interlining fabrics. The Stephenson Speciality Chemicals FYRBAN C process exhibits the following benefits over traditional methods of producing Schedule 3 interlining fabrics: no fumes during processing, no yellowing of fabric, no loss of fabric strength, simple one-pass pad application, does not contain bromine or antimony, non-hazardous and biodegradable ingredients, very low opacity and fewer variables in processing. It is produced on an ISO 14001 accredited plant.
How do crib tests produce contrary results?
Ursachen für unterschiedliche Ergebnisse bei Entflammbarkeitstests.
Finan, Peter (Autor:in)
International Dyer ; 189 ; 15-18
2004
3 Seiten, 7 Bilder
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch