Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Ignition resistance of hard (type III) anodized aluminum to particle impact
The ignition resistance of hard (type III) anodized aluminum alloy to particle impact in pure oxygen was investigated. Test samples with aluminum oxide film thicknesses of 3 my m (0.12 mils), 5 my m (0.20 mils), 20 my m (0.79 mils), and 50 my m (1.97 mils) were tested at six different temperatures ranging from 239 K (-28 degree F) to 672 K (750 degree F). These anodized test samples were placed in a supersonic particle impact chamber with the impact surfaces directly exposed to the impacting particles. Aluminum alloy particles of 2000 my m (0.078 in.) diameter were used to promote ignition upon impact. The event of ignition was recorded on standard video. The test results are plotted as Logistic Regression curves showing the ignition frequency over the temperature range tested. The results are compared to previously tested soft anodized (type II) aluminum alloy and bare aluminum alloy. The results indicate that the hard (type III) anodized coating offers increased resistance to particle impact ignition as compared to bare aluminum. The data is inconclusive as to which anodization process (type II or type III) provides better protection from ignition.
Ignition resistance of hard (type III) anodized aluminum to particle impact
The ignition resistance of hard (type III) anodized aluminum alloy to particle impact in pure oxygen was investigated. Test samples with aluminum oxide film thicknesses of 3 my m (0.12 mils), 5 my m (0.20 mils), 20 my m (0.79 mils), and 50 my m (1.97 mils) were tested at six different temperatures ranging from 239 K (-28 degree F) to 672 K (750 degree F). These anodized test samples were placed in a supersonic particle impact chamber with the impact surfaces directly exposed to the impacting particles. Aluminum alloy particles of 2000 my m (0.078 in.) diameter were used to promote ignition upon impact. The event of ignition was recorded on standard video. The test results are plotted as Logistic Regression curves showing the ignition frequency over the temperature range tested. The results are compared to previously tested soft anodized (type II) aluminum alloy and bare aluminum alloy. The results indicate that the hard (type III) anodized coating offers increased resistance to particle impact ignition as compared to bare aluminum. The data is inconclusive as to which anodization process (type II or type III) provides better protection from ignition.
Ignition resistance of hard (type III) anodized aluminum to particle impact
Forsyth, E.T. (Autor:in) / Stoltzfus, J.M. (Autor:in)
1997
10 Seiten, 9 Quellen
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Englisch
Corrosion Resistance of Anodized Aluminum Oxide Film
| British Library Online Contents | 2006
Fatigue strength of hard anodized Ergal 65-TA aluminum alloy rolled products
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1965
Corrosion resistance and optical transmission of anodized aluminum oxide membrane
| British Library Online Contents | 2010
New dried anodized aluminum capacitor
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1965
Effects of Anodizing Parameters on Corrosion Resistance of Anodized Aluminum
| British Library Online Contents | 2002