Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Aqueous Bromate Reduction by UV Activation of Sulfite
Photoactivation of SO32− with UV (254 nm) irradiation was adopted to generate the hydrated electron‐based advanced reduction process, which was used to degrade BrO3− in water. The second‐order reaction rate constant of BrO3− with hydrated electron was determined, and the effects of operational parameters (dosage of SO32−, solution pH, HCO3−, humic acids (HA), and dissolved oxygen (DO)) were evaluated. The transformation intermediates of BrO3− and SO32− were identified and mass balances of bromine and sulfur were checked. Results showed a positive correlation between the removal efficiency of BrO3− and dosage of SO32− (0.5–2.0 mM). Increasing the solution pH from 5 to 9 promoted elimination of BrO3− because of the pH‐dependent effect of SO32− photoactivity, whereas further increasing the pH from 9 to 10 caused no further enhancement. In addition, 1–4 mM HCO3− exerted about 5% inhibition on BrO3− destruction, indicating that HCO3− is a weak inhibitor. The presence of 1.5–4.0 mg L−1 HA deteriorated BrO3− degradation, while depletion of DO by N2 bubbling benefitted BrO3− removal. The balances of bromine and sulfur denoted that the final transformation products of BrO3− and SO32− were harmless SO42−, bromide, and minor dithionate.
Aqueous Bromate Reduction by UV Activation of Sulfite
Photoactivation of SO32− with UV (254 nm) irradiation was adopted to generate the hydrated electron‐based advanced reduction process, which was used to degrade BrO3− in water. The second‐order reaction rate constant of BrO3− with hydrated electron was determined, and the effects of operational parameters (dosage of SO32−, solution pH, HCO3−, humic acids (HA), and dissolved oxygen (DO)) were evaluated. The transformation intermediates of BrO3− and SO32− were identified and mass balances of bromine and sulfur were checked. Results showed a positive correlation between the removal efficiency of BrO3− and dosage of SO32− (0.5–2.0 mM). Increasing the solution pH from 5 to 9 promoted elimination of BrO3− because of the pH‐dependent effect of SO32− photoactivity, whereas further increasing the pH from 9 to 10 caused no further enhancement. In addition, 1–4 mM HCO3− exerted about 5% inhibition on BrO3− destruction, indicating that HCO3− is a weak inhibitor. The presence of 1.5–4.0 mg L−1 HA deteriorated BrO3− degradation, while depletion of DO by N2 bubbling benefitted BrO3− removal. The balances of bromine and sulfur denoted that the final transformation products of BrO3− and SO32− were harmless SO42−, bromide, and minor dithionate.
Aqueous Bromate Reduction by UV Activation of Sulfite
Liu, Xiaowei (Autor:in) / Zhang, Tuqiao (Autor:in) / Shao, Yu (Autor:in)
CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water ; 42 ; 1370-1375
01.10.2014
6 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Impact of natural organic matter on bromate removal in the sulfite/UV-L advanced reduction process
Online Contents | 2016
|The Use of Sulfite Ion or Reduced Iron for the Removal of Bromate Ion
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|Bromate reduction in simulated gastric juice
Wiley | 2010
|Bromate Reduction: Another Benefit of GAC
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
|Chemical Reduction Methods for Bromate Ion Removal
Wiley | 2002
|