Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Dynamics and seismic performance of rocking bridges accounting for the abutment‐backfill contribution
The present study explores analytically the concept of rocking isolation in bridges considering for the first time the influence of the abutment‐backfill system. The dynamic response of rocking bridges with free‐standing piers of same height and same section is examined assuming negligible deformation for the substructure and the superstructure. New relationships for the prediction of the bridge rocking motion are derived, including the equation of motion and the restitution coefficient at each impact at the rocking interfaces. The bridge structure is found to be susceptible to a failure mode related to the failure of the abutment‐backfill system, which can occur prior to the well‐known overturning of the rocking piers. Thus, a new failure spectrum is proposed called Failure Minimum Acceleration Spectrum (FMAS) which extends the overturning spectrum put forward in previous studies, and it differs in principle from the latter. The comparison with the dynamic response of bridges modelled as rocking frames without abutments reveals not only that seat‐type abutments and their backfill have a generally beneficial effect on the seismic performance of rocking pier bridges by suppressing the free rocking motion of the frame system, but also that the simple frame model cannot capture all salient features of the rocking bridge response as it misses potential failure modes, overestimating the rocking bridge's safety when these modes are critical.
Dynamics and seismic performance of rocking bridges accounting for the abutment‐backfill contribution
The present study explores analytically the concept of rocking isolation in bridges considering for the first time the influence of the abutment‐backfill system. The dynamic response of rocking bridges with free‐standing piers of same height and same section is examined assuming negligible deformation for the substructure and the superstructure. New relationships for the prediction of the bridge rocking motion are derived, including the equation of motion and the restitution coefficient at each impact at the rocking interfaces. The bridge structure is found to be susceptible to a failure mode related to the failure of the abutment‐backfill system, which can occur prior to the well‐known overturning of the rocking piers. Thus, a new failure spectrum is proposed called Failure Minimum Acceleration Spectrum (FMAS) which extends the overturning spectrum put forward in previous studies, and it differs in principle from the latter. The comparison with the dynamic response of bridges modelled as rocking frames without abutments reveals not only that seat‐type abutments and their backfill have a generally beneficial effect on the seismic performance of rocking pier bridges by suppressing the free rocking motion of the frame system, but also that the simple frame model cannot capture all salient features of the rocking bridge response as it misses potential failure modes, overestimating the rocking bridge's safety when these modes are critical.
Dynamics and seismic performance of rocking bridges accounting for the abutment‐backfill contribution
Thomaidis, Ioannis M. (Autor:in) / Kappos, Andreas J. (Autor:in) / Camara, Alfredo (Autor:in)
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics ; 49 ; 1161-1179
10.10.2020
19 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Seismic Performance of Integral Abutment Bridges
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|Seismic embankment-abutment-structure interaction of integral abutment bridges
BASE | 2011
|Performance-based seismic design of integral abutment bridges
British Library Online Contents | 2014
|Performance-based seismic design of integral abutment bridges
Springer Verlag | 2014
|