Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Evaluation of numerical time‐integration schemes for real‐time hybrid testing
10.1002/eqe.821.abs
We present a comparison of methods for the analysis of the numerical substructure in a real‐time hybrid test. A multi‐tasking strategy is described, which satisfies the various control and numerical requirements. Within this strategy a variety of explicit and implicit time‐integration algorithms have been evaluated. Fully implicit schemes can be used in fast hybrid testing via a digital sub‐step feedback technique, but it is shown that this approach requires a large amount of computation at each sub‐step, making real‐time execution difficult for all but the simplest models. In cases where the numerical substructure poses no harsh stability condition, it is shown that the Newmark explicit method offers advantages of speed and accuracy. Where the stability limit of an explicit method cannot be met, one of the several alternatives may be used, such as Chang's modified Newmark scheme or the α‐operator splitting method. Appropriate methods of actuator delay compensation are also discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Evaluation of numerical time‐integration schemes for real‐time hybrid testing
10.1002/eqe.821.abs
We present a comparison of methods for the analysis of the numerical substructure in a real‐time hybrid test. A multi‐tasking strategy is described, which satisfies the various control and numerical requirements. Within this strategy a variety of explicit and implicit time‐integration algorithms have been evaluated. Fully implicit schemes can be used in fast hybrid testing via a digital sub‐step feedback technique, but it is shown that this approach requires a large amount of computation at each sub‐step, making real‐time execution difficult for all but the simplest models. In cases where the numerical substructure poses no harsh stability condition, it is shown that the Newmark explicit method offers advantages of speed and accuracy. Where the stability limit of an explicit method cannot be met, one of the several alternatives may be used, such as Chang's modified Newmark scheme or the α‐operator splitting method. Appropriate methods of actuator delay compensation are also discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Evaluation of numerical time‐integration schemes for real‐time hybrid testing
Bonnet, P. A. (Autor:in) / Williams, M. S. (Autor:in) / Blakeborough, A. (Autor:in)
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics ; 37 ; 1467-1490
25.10.2008
24 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Evaluation of numerical time-integration schemes for real-time hybrid testing
| Online Contents | 2008
New Unconditionally Stable Explicit Integration Algorithm for Real-Time Hybrid Testing
| Online Contents | 2017
Real-Time Hybrid Testing Using an Unconditionally Stable Explicit Integration Algorithm
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
New Unconditionally Stable Explicit Integration Algorithm for Real-Time Hybrid Testing
| Online Contents | 2017