Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Sliding fragility of block‐type non‐structural components. Part 2: Restrained components
10.1002/eqe.218.abs
This paper focuses on seismic vulnerability assessment of restrained block‐type non‐structural components under sliding response on the basis of seismic inputs specified by current seismic codes. The general representation of restrained equipment considered in this study consists of a rigid block restrained by four post‐tensioned, symmetrically arranged cables. Two sliding‐related failure modes are considered: restraint breakage and excessive absolute acceleration. Fragility analysis is proposed as an appropriate tool to evaluate these failure modes. Sample fragility curves developed through Monte‐Carlo simulations show that the restraint breakage limit state is sensitive to the parameters of the equation of motion. For instance, fragility estimates obtained without taking into account vertical base accelerations can be significantly unconservative for relatively large values of the coefficient of friction. In contrast, the excessive absolute acceleration limit state exhibits little sensitivity to the parameters of the equation of motion. Peak absolute acceleration response is almost always equal to or greater than the horizontal peak base acceleration. Representative results suggest that reasonable response estimates for blocks located at stories other than the ground in multistorey buildings can in general be obtained by simply scaling the ground acceleration to the peak acceleration at the corresponding storey. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sliding fragility of block‐type non‐structural components. Part 2: Restrained components
10.1002/eqe.218.abs
This paper focuses on seismic vulnerability assessment of restrained block‐type non‐structural components under sliding response on the basis of seismic inputs specified by current seismic codes. The general representation of restrained equipment considered in this study consists of a rigid block restrained by four post‐tensioned, symmetrically arranged cables. Two sliding‐related failure modes are considered: restraint breakage and excessive absolute acceleration. Fragility analysis is proposed as an appropriate tool to evaluate these failure modes. Sample fragility curves developed through Monte‐Carlo simulations show that the restraint breakage limit state is sensitive to the parameters of the equation of motion. For instance, fragility estimates obtained without taking into account vertical base accelerations can be significantly unconservative for relatively large values of the coefficient of friction. In contrast, the excessive absolute acceleration limit state exhibits little sensitivity to the parameters of the equation of motion. Peak absolute acceleration response is almost always equal to or greater than the horizontal peak base acceleration. Representative results suggest that reasonable response estimates for blocks located at stories other than the ground in multistorey buildings can in general be obtained by simply scaling the ground acceleration to the peak acceleration at the corresponding storey. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sliding fragility of block‐type non‐structural components. Part 2: Restrained components
Lopez Garcia, D. (Autor:in) / Soong, T. T. (Autor:in)
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics ; 32 ; 131-149
01.01.2003
19 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Sliding fragility of block-type non-structural components. Part 2: Restrained components
Online Contents | 2003
|Sliding Fragility of Block-Type Restrained Nonstructural Components
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|Sliding fragility of block-type non-structural components. Part 1: Unrestrained components
Online Contents | 2003
|