Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Nonsmooth dynamics prediction of measured bridge response involving deck‐abutment pounding
Earthquake‐induced deck‐abutment contact alters the boundary conditions at the deck level and might activate a different mechanical system than the one assumed during the design of the bridge. Occasionally this discrepancy between the assumed and the actual seismic behavior has detrimental consequences, for example, pier damage, deck unseating, or even collapse. Recently, an insightful shake‐table testing of a scaled deck‐abutment bridge model [], showed unexpected in‐plane rotations even though the deck was straight. These contact‐induced rotations produced significant residual displacements and damage to the piers and the bents. The present paper utilizes that experimental data to examine the validity and the limitations of a proposed nonsmooth dynamic analysis framework. The results show that the proposed approach satisfactorily captures the planar rigid‐body dynamics of the deck which is characterized by deck‐abutment contact. The analysis brings forward the role of friction on the physical mechanism behind the rotation of the deck, and underlines the importance of considering the frictional contact forces during deck‐abutment interaction even for straight bridges, which typically are neglected. Finally, the paper investigates the sensitivity of the rotation with respect to macroscopic contact parameters (i.e., the coefficient of friction and the coefficient of restitution). Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Nonsmooth dynamics prediction of measured bridge response involving deck‐abutment pounding
Earthquake‐induced deck‐abutment contact alters the boundary conditions at the deck level and might activate a different mechanical system than the one assumed during the design of the bridge. Occasionally this discrepancy between the assumed and the actual seismic behavior has detrimental consequences, for example, pier damage, deck unseating, or even collapse. Recently, an insightful shake‐table testing of a scaled deck‐abutment bridge model [], showed unexpected in‐plane rotations even though the deck was straight. These contact‐induced rotations produced significant residual displacements and damage to the piers and the bents. The present paper utilizes that experimental data to examine the validity and the limitations of a proposed nonsmooth dynamic analysis framework. The results show that the proposed approach satisfactorily captures the planar rigid‐body dynamics of the deck which is characterized by deck‐abutment contact. The analysis brings forward the role of friction on the physical mechanism behind the rotation of the deck, and underlines the importance of considering the frictional contact forces during deck‐abutment interaction even for straight bridges, which typically are neglected. Finally, the paper investigates the sensitivity of the rotation with respect to macroscopic contact parameters (i.e., the coefficient of friction and the coefficient of restitution). Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Nonsmooth dynamics prediction of measured bridge response involving deck‐abutment pounding
Shi, Zhongqi (Autor:in) / Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G. (Autor:in)
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics ; 46 ; 1431-1452
25.07.2017
22 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Seismic response analysis of skew bridges with pounding deck–abutment joints
Online Contents | 2011
|Effect of abutment excitation on bridge pounding
Elsevier | 2013
|Effect of abutment excitation on bridge pounding
Online Contents | 2013
|Effect of abutment excitation on bridge pounding
Elsevier | 2013
|