Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Improving Gold (Bio)Leaching Efficiency Through Pretreatment Using Hydrogen Peroxide Assisted Sulfuric Acid
Compared to conventional recycling methods, the recovery of gold from electronic waste (e‐waste) using bioleaching is more environmentally friendly and sustainable. E‐wastes contain large amounts of copper that forms stable complexes with cyanide and competes with gold during bioleaching. To overcome this, e‐waste from printed circuit boards was pretreated with sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide to remove copper from the waste. The kinetics of the copper removal process was examined by varying sulfuric acid concentrations, hydrogen peroxide concentrations, e‐waste particle sizes, and temperature. Both sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide showed a significant effect on pretreatment; copper removal from the e‐waste was found to fit the diffusion‐controlled model. Under optimal pretreatment conditions (5 M H2SO4, 5 M H2O2, T = 313 K, and do = 50–75 μm, 85.5% of copper was removed from the e‐waste. Two‐step bioleaching (where e‐waste was added only after the bacteria has grown and produced significant lixiviant) and spent medium leaching (i.e., using cell‐free medium containing the lixiviant) were examined using the metabolically engineered Chromobacterium violaceum pBAD strain for extraction of gold from e‐waste. Spent medium leaching achieved a gold recovery of 36.4% as compared to 24.7% under two‐step bioleaching for pretreated e‐waste.
Improving Gold (Bio)Leaching Efficiency Through Pretreatment Using Hydrogen Peroxide Assisted Sulfuric Acid
Compared to conventional recycling methods, the recovery of gold from electronic waste (e‐waste) using bioleaching is more environmentally friendly and sustainable. E‐wastes contain large amounts of copper that forms stable complexes with cyanide and competes with gold during bioleaching. To overcome this, e‐waste from printed circuit boards was pretreated with sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide to remove copper from the waste. The kinetics of the copper removal process was examined by varying sulfuric acid concentrations, hydrogen peroxide concentrations, e‐waste particle sizes, and temperature. Both sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide showed a significant effect on pretreatment; copper removal from the e‐waste was found to fit the diffusion‐controlled model. Under optimal pretreatment conditions (5 M H2SO4, 5 M H2O2, T = 313 K, and do = 50–75 μm, 85.5% of copper was removed from the e‐waste. Two‐step bioleaching (where e‐waste was added only after the bacteria has grown and produced significant lixiviant) and spent medium leaching (i.e., using cell‐free medium containing the lixiviant) were examined using the metabolically engineered Chromobacterium violaceum pBAD strain for extraction of gold from e‐waste. Spent medium leaching achieved a gold recovery of 36.4% as compared to 24.7% under two‐step bioleaching for pretreated e‐waste.
Improving Gold (Bio)Leaching Efficiency Through Pretreatment Using Hydrogen Peroxide Assisted Sulfuric Acid
Das, Subhabrata (Autor:in) / Ting, Yen‐Peng (Autor:in)
01.06.2017
8 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2002
|Copper Leaching Behavior of Iron-Oxide Hosted Copper-Gold Ore in Sulfuric Acid Medium
British Library Online Contents | 2008
|Recovery of Cobalt in Sulfuric Acid Leaching Solution Using Oxalic Acid
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2006
|Leaching of chalcopyrite concentrate by hydrogen peroxide in sulphuric acid solution
DOAJ | 2019
|Leaching of vanadium from stone coal with sulfuric acid
British Library Online Contents | 2009
|