Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Study of a semi‐active stiffness damper under various earthquake inputs
10.1002/eqe.181.abs
Semi‐active stiffness damper (SASD) is one of many semi‐active control systems with the capability to mitigate the dynamic response using only a small amount of external power. The system consists of a hydraulic damper connected to the bracing frame in a selected story unit. In this paper, study of a SASD in two building models of five‐stories under four benchmark earthquake records is reported. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the control system against structure type and varying earthquake inputs. Various control laws are chosen to work with SASD, such as: resetting control, switching control, linear quadratic regulator (LQR) and modified LQR, and the results are compared with no control and passive control cases. Numerical results show that the use of a SASD is effective in reducing seismic responses. Control effectiveness is dependent on the type of structure and earthquake excitation. Passive control is less effective than other control cases as expected. Resetting control, switching control and LQR generally perform similarly in response reduction. While modified LQR is more efficient and robust compared with other control algorithms. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Study of a semi‐active stiffness damper under various earthquake inputs
10.1002/eqe.181.abs
Semi‐active stiffness damper (SASD) is one of many semi‐active control systems with the capability to mitigate the dynamic response using only a small amount of external power. The system consists of a hydraulic damper connected to the bracing frame in a selected story unit. In this paper, study of a SASD in two building models of five‐stories under four benchmark earthquake records is reported. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the control system against structure type and varying earthquake inputs. Various control laws are chosen to work with SASD, such as: resetting control, switching control, linear quadratic regulator (LQR) and modified LQR, and the results are compared with no control and passive control cases. Numerical results show that the use of a SASD is effective in reducing seismic responses. Control effectiveness is dependent on the type of structure and earthquake excitation. Passive control is less effective than other control cases as expected. Resetting control, switching control and LQR generally perform similarly in response reduction. While modified LQR is more efficient and robust compared with other control algorithms. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Study of a semi‐active stiffness damper under various earthquake inputs
Djajakesukma, S. L. (Autor:in) / Samali, B. (Autor:in) / Nguyen, H. (Autor:in)
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics ; 31 ; 1757-1776
01.10.2002
20 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Semi-active graded energy consumption variable stiffness damper
| Europäisches Patentamt | 2024
Robustness of semi-active stiffness damper with system uncertainty
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
Study on semi‐active tuned mass damper with variable damping and stiffness under seismic excitations
| Wiley | 2014
Semi-active control of eccentric structure under multi-dimensional earthquake using MR damper
| British Library Online Contents | 2004