Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Indoor boundary layer chemistry modeling
Ozone (O3) chemistry is thought to dominate the oxidation of indoor surfaces. We consider the hypothesis that reactions taking place within indoor boundary layers result in greater than anticipated hydroxyl radical (OH) deposition rates. We develop models that account for boundary layer mass‐transfer phenomena, O3‐terpene chemistry and OH formation, removal, and deposition; we solve these analytically and by applying numerical methods. For an O3‐limonene system, we find that OH flux to a surface with an O3 reaction probability of 10−8 is 4.3 × 10−5 molec/(cm2 s) which is about 10 times greater than predicted by a traditional boundary layer theory. At very low air exchange rates the OH surface flux can be as much as 10% of that for O3. This effect becomes less pronounced for more O3‐reactive surfaces. Turbulence intensity does not strongly influence the OH concentration gradient except for surfaces with an O3 reaction probability >10−4. Although the O3 flux dominates OH flux under most conditions, OH flux can be responsible for as much as 10% of total oxidant uptake to otherwise low‐reactivity surfaces. Further, OH chemistry differs from that for ozone; therefore, its deposition is important in understanding the chemical evolution of some indoor surfaces and surface films.
Indoor boundary layer chemistry modeling
Ozone (O3) chemistry is thought to dominate the oxidation of indoor surfaces. We consider the hypothesis that reactions taking place within indoor boundary layers result in greater than anticipated hydroxyl radical (OH) deposition rates. We develop models that account for boundary layer mass‐transfer phenomena, O3‐terpene chemistry and OH formation, removal, and deposition; we solve these analytically and by applying numerical methods. For an O3‐limonene system, we find that OH flux to a surface with an O3 reaction probability of 10−8 is 4.3 × 10−5 molec/(cm2 s) which is about 10 times greater than predicted by a traditional boundary layer theory. At very low air exchange rates the OH surface flux can be as much as 10% of that for O3. This effect becomes less pronounced for more O3‐reactive surfaces. Turbulence intensity does not strongly influence the OH concentration gradient except for surfaces with an O3 reaction probability >10−4. Although the O3 flux dominates OH flux under most conditions, OH flux can be responsible for as much as 10% of total oxidant uptake to otherwise low‐reactivity surfaces. Further, OH chemistry differs from that for ozone; therefore, its deposition is important in understanding the chemical evolution of some indoor surfaces and surface films.
Indoor boundary layer chemistry modeling
Morrison, Glenn (Autor:in) / Lakey, Pascale S. J. (Autor:in) / Abbatt, Jonathan (Autor:in) / Shiraiwa, Manabu (Autor:in)
Indoor Air ; 29 ; 956-967
01.11.2019
12 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
boundary layer , ozone , radical , surface chemistry , oxidation , model
Effect of Moisture Storage on Indoor Humidity and Vapour Boundary Layer Thickness
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
Experimental investigation of the human convective boundary layer in a quiescent indoor environment
| Online Contents | 2014
Experimental investigation of the human convective boundary layer in a quiescent indoor environment
| British Library Online Contents | 2014
INDOOR OZONE CHEMISTRY UNDER SOLAR RADIATION
| TIBKAT | 2021