A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The Economic Infeasibility of Salinity Gradient Energy via Pressure Retarded Osmosis
Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) harvests the chemical potential difference between water sources of two different salinities and has been widely researched as a source of low carbon energy. This study identifies the cost-optimal design and operation using a nonlinear programming model to minimize the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of a PRO system for specified process and financial parameters. Our model includes a detailed finite difference module-scale model that considers the pressure drop along the module, nonconstant solution properties, local mass transfer coefficients, and equipment inefficiencies that previous analyses lacked. Under realistic case specifications and present-day costs, the expected median LCOE ranges from $2.37/kWh (seawater draw) to $0.11/kWh (Dead Sea draw). The optimistic case specifications, which assume significant improvements in process performance with no additional increase in cost, lower these median costs to $1.00/kWh (seawater draw) and $0.05/kWh (Dead Sea draw). These estimates exclude variable pretreatment costs and are likely to underestimate the actual LCOE. Membrane costs and maintenance are the primary cost components for all cases. Comparing the LCOE and capacity factor of PRO to other low carbon energy sources suggests that reductions in PRO component costs are unlikely to make PRO cost competitive with renewable energy technologies.
The Economic Infeasibility of Salinity Gradient Energy via Pressure Retarded Osmosis
Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) harvests the chemical potential difference between water sources of two different salinities and has been widely researched as a source of low carbon energy. This study identifies the cost-optimal design and operation using a nonlinear programming model to minimize the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of a PRO system for specified process and financial parameters. Our model includes a detailed finite difference module-scale model that considers the pressure drop along the module, nonconstant solution properties, local mass transfer coefficients, and equipment inefficiencies that previous analyses lacked. Under realistic case specifications and present-day costs, the expected median LCOE ranges from $2.37/kWh (seawater draw) to $0.11/kWh (Dead Sea draw). The optimistic case specifications, which assume significant improvements in process performance with no additional increase in cost, lower these median costs to $1.00/kWh (seawater draw) and $0.05/kWh (Dead Sea draw). These estimates exclude variable pretreatment costs and are likely to underestimate the actual LCOE. Membrane costs and maintenance are the primary cost components for all cases. Comparing the LCOE and capacity factor of PRO to other low carbon energy sources suggests that reductions in PRO component costs are unlikely to make PRO cost competitive with renewable energy technologies.
The Economic Infeasibility of Salinity Gradient Energy via Pressure Retarded Osmosis
Newby, Alexandra N. (author) / Bartholomew, Timothy V. (author) / Mauter, Meagan S. (author)
ACS ES&T Engineering ; 1 ; 1113-1121
2021-07-09
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
A first estimate for a pressure retarded osmosis-driven thermosyphon
British Library Online Contents | 2018
|A first estimate for a pressure retarded osmosis-driven thermosyphon
British Library Online Contents | 2018
|A first estimate for a pressure retarded osmosis-driven thermosyphon
British Library Online Contents | 2018
|A first estimate for a pressure retarded osmosis-driven thermosyphon
British Library Online Contents | 2018
|