A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Power production of the hybrid Wavestar point absorber mounted around the Hywind spar platform and its dynamic response
This article presents the novel hybrid Wavestar–Hywind concept that combines a floating wind turbine with a number of Wavestar point-absorbers on a shared OC3-Hywind spar platform. The effect of increasing Wavestar number on the wave power production and platform motions has been investigated using both time and frequency domains. Simulations were carried out with the boundary element method using the three-dimensional diffraction/radiation theory, which is employed by the ANSYS AQWA software. Regular Airy wave under different wave periods from 4 to 16 s and constant wave height (1.2 m) was considered as an environmental condition. The results of the response amplitude operator (RAO) motions of the platform show that increasing wave periods cause an increase on the surge, heave, and pitch RAO. Moreover, in higher periods as Wavestar numbers increase, the heave motion decreases, while it does not significantly affect the surge and pitch motions. Due to Wavestar resonance, the maximum capture width ratio occurs in wave periods 5 and 6 s for all case studies, that means higher Wavestar power and lower platform motion due to increasing radiation damping force. Furthermore, the result shows that the angle between Wavestar arm and wave direction and its location are two main factors that influence the power production. The maximum power absorbed by Wavestar occurs in the wave periods 6 s and makes 46, 103, 160, and 210 kW power for 3, 6, 9, and 12 WS, respectively.
Power production of the hybrid Wavestar point absorber mounted around the Hywind spar platform and its dynamic response
This article presents the novel hybrid Wavestar–Hywind concept that combines a floating wind turbine with a number of Wavestar point-absorbers on a shared OC3-Hywind spar platform. The effect of increasing Wavestar number on the wave power production and platform motions has been investigated using both time and frequency domains. Simulations were carried out with the boundary element method using the three-dimensional diffraction/radiation theory, which is employed by the ANSYS AQWA software. Regular Airy wave under different wave periods from 4 to 16 s and constant wave height (1.2 m) was considered as an environmental condition. The results of the response amplitude operator (RAO) motions of the platform show that increasing wave periods cause an increase on the surge, heave, and pitch RAO. Moreover, in higher periods as Wavestar numbers increase, the heave motion decreases, while it does not significantly affect the surge and pitch motions. Due to Wavestar resonance, the maximum capture width ratio occurs in wave periods 5 and 6 s for all case studies, that means higher Wavestar power and lower platform motion due to increasing radiation damping force. Furthermore, the result shows that the angle between Wavestar arm and wave direction and its location are two main factors that influence the power production. The maximum power absorbed by Wavestar occurs in the wave periods 6 s and makes 46, 103, 160, and 210 kW power for 3, 6, 9, and 12 WS, respectively.
Power production of the hybrid Wavestar point absorber mounted around the Hywind spar platform and its dynamic response
Ghafari, Hamid Reza (author) / Neisi, Atefeh (author) / Ghassemi, Hassan (author) / Iranmanesh, Mehdi (author)
2021-05-01
15 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Deepwater Spar Platform Response: Analysis and Prediction
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
|Contruction method for spar platform cylindrical deck and upper facilities and spar platform
European Patent Office | 2020
Comparison of Laboratory and Field Spar Platform Response Behavior
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
|