A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Revisiting Winner Take All (WTA) Hashing for Sparse Datasets
WTA (Winner Take All) hashing has been successfully applied in many large scale vision applications. This hashing scheme was tailored to take advantage of the comparative reasoning (or order based information), which showed significant accuracy improvements. In this paper, we identify a subtle issue with WTA, which grows with the sparsity of the datasets. This issue limits the discriminative power of WTA. We then propose a solution for this problem based on the idea of Densification which provably fixes the issue. Our experiments show that Densified WTA Hashing outperforms Vanilla WTA both in image classification and retrieval tasks consistently and significantly.
Revisiting Winner Take All (WTA) Hashing for Sparse Datasets
WTA (Winner Take All) hashing has been successfully applied in many large scale vision applications. This hashing scheme was tailored to take advantage of the comparative reasoning (or order based information), which showed significant accuracy improvements. In this paper, we identify a subtle issue with WTA, which grows with the sparsity of the datasets. This issue limits the discriminative power of WTA. We then propose a solution for this problem based on the idea of Densification which provably fixes the issue. Our experiments show that Densified WTA Hashing outperforms Vanilla WTA both in image classification and retrieval tasks consistently and significantly.
Revisiting Winner Take All (WTA) Hashing for Sparse Datasets
Chen, Beidi (author) / Shrivastava, Anshumali (author)
2016
Preprint
Electronic Resource
English
emph TYPE="1">Winner Take All: How Competitiveness Shapes the Fate of Nations
| Online Contents | 2009
British Library Online Contents | 2002
Online Contents | 1994
British Library Online Contents | 2004
British Library Online Contents | 2007