A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Costly Oversights in Geotechnical Practice
The author was engaged to review three projects where either settlement or instability had occurred thereby resulting in costly repair operations. The problems arose for a number of reasons including an oversight where geotechnical issues were not properly addressed or overlooked, extending the state of the practice beyond proven techniques without adequate confirmation, and less than acceptable monitoring during construction. Case 1 involved an attempt to achieve ground improvement of buried weak deposits below deep fill by dynamic compaction without consideration of the depth of improvement achieved and the compressibility of the underlying deposits. Another example includes the improper use of dynamic compaction to densify fill deposits containing large portions of lumber. Case 2 involves a residential structure supported upon compacted silty clay fill that is on the order of 4.6 m thick under one portion of the building with only a shallow fill under the other portion. Differential settlements resulted in cracking in the structure and the floor slab and the need for underpinning. Case 3 involves an excavation for a future landfill through over consolidated clayey glacial till soil with a compacted clay liner on the slope face. During construction, a number of shallow sliding surfaces developed resulting in the need for removal of the clay liner, providing adequate drainage discharge, and reconstruction of the slope face.
Costly Oversights in Geotechnical Practice
The author was engaged to review three projects where either settlement or instability had occurred thereby resulting in costly repair operations. The problems arose for a number of reasons including an oversight where geotechnical issues were not properly addressed or overlooked, extending the state of the practice beyond proven techniques without adequate confirmation, and less than acceptable monitoring during construction. Case 1 involved an attempt to achieve ground improvement of buried weak deposits below deep fill by dynamic compaction without consideration of the depth of improvement achieved and the compressibility of the underlying deposits. Another example includes the improper use of dynamic compaction to densify fill deposits containing large portions of lumber. Case 2 involves a residential structure supported upon compacted silty clay fill that is on the order of 4.6 m thick under one portion of the building with only a shallow fill under the other portion. Differential settlements resulted in cracking in the structure and the floor slab and the need for underpinning. Case 3 involves an excavation for a future landfill through over consolidated clayey glacial till soil with a compacted clay liner on the slope face. During construction, a number of shallow sliding surfaces developed resulting in the need for removal of the clay liner, providing adequate drainage discharge, and reconstruction of the slope face.
Costly Oversights in Geotechnical Practice
Lukas, Robert G. (author)
Geo-Chicago 2016 ; 2016 ; Chicago, Illinois
Geo-Chicago 2016 ; 707-717
2016-08-08
Conference paper
Electronic Resource
English
Costly Oversights in Geotechnical Practice
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2016
|Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2017
|Pavement Failures: Oversights, Omissions and Wishful Thinking.
Online Contents | 1993
|Dormant Curtain Wall Anchors: Relative Stiffness Oversights
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
|