A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Rotational Stiffness of Wood Truss Joints in Lateral and Diagonal Bracing and Truss–Wall Connections
The modeling and structural analysis of roof systems composed of metal plate–connected wood trusses (MPCWTs) require a detailed understanding of the rotational stiffness associated with various connections of the MPCWTs to the bracing elements and to the walls supporting the roof. The purpose of this study was to measure the rotational stiffness of several truss–bracing and truss–wall connections attached to MPCWTs to be used for structural modeling. Bracing included discrete and continuous bracing supporting the top and bottom chords of trusses. Truss–wall connections used single fasteners and proprietary sheet-metal connections. For the bracing connections, the rotational stiffness of the discrete bracing was greater than the rotational stiffness of the continuous bracing. Joist hanger–style truss–wall connections had greater rotational stiffness compared with hurricane ties or single-fastener connections. The rotational stiffness of hurricane ties was much greater when the applied torque caused a tension force in the hurricane tie versus a compression force. The rotational stiffness of hurricane ties from two different manufacturers was not significantly different.
Rotational Stiffness of Wood Truss Joints in Lateral and Diagonal Bracing and Truss–Wall Connections
The modeling and structural analysis of roof systems composed of metal plate–connected wood trusses (MPCWTs) require a detailed understanding of the rotational stiffness associated with various connections of the MPCWTs to the bracing elements and to the walls supporting the roof. The purpose of this study was to measure the rotational stiffness of several truss–bracing and truss–wall connections attached to MPCWTs to be used for structural modeling. Bracing included discrete and continuous bracing supporting the top and bottom chords of trusses. Truss–wall connections used single fasteners and proprietary sheet-metal connections. For the bracing connections, the rotational stiffness of the discrete bracing was greater than the rotational stiffness of the continuous bracing. Joist hanger–style truss–wall connections had greater rotational stiffness compared with hurricane ties or single-fastener connections. The rotational stiffness of hurricane ties was much greater when the applied torque caused a tension force in the hurricane tie versus a compression force. The rotational stiffness of hurricane ties from two different manufacturers was not significantly different.
Rotational Stiffness of Wood Truss Joints in Lateral and Diagonal Bracing and Truss–Wall Connections
Mohamadzadeh, Milad (author) / Hindman, Daniel P. (author) / Whaley, Annaliese G. (author)
2019-01-10
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Rotational Stiffness of Wood Truss Joints in Lateral and Diagonal Bracing and Truss-Wall Connections
British Library Online Contents | 2019
|WOOD TRUSS BRACING RULES UPDATED
British Library Online Contents | 2011
|Impact of Permanent Diagonal Bracing on Different MPC Wood Truss Types
British Library Online Contents | 1999
|Design Methods for Truss and Bracing Connections
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|ARTICLES - Impact of Permanent Diagonal Bracing on Different MPC Wood Truss Types
Online Contents | 1999
|